Hi Ben,
okay, I've added a comment, see attached v3. if I hear no complains I'll commit this patch next monday. Gerd ________________________________ Von: mkgmap-dev-boun...@lists.mkgmap.org.uk <mkgmap-dev-boun...@lists.mkgmap.org.uk> im Auftrag von Ben Konrath <b...@bagu.org> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 22. Oktober 2015 21:30 An: Development list for mkgmap Betreff: Re: [mkgmap-dev] [patch v1] don't route the highway=construction ways Hi Gerd, Thanks for the explanation (again) and for the new patch. This approach is probably better considering the concerns about v1. Perhaps you can add a comment about this new rule above the highway=construction statement in the lines file. That way people will be able to find the special handling when reading the lines file. Thanks, Ben On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 6:54 AM, Gerd Petermann <gpetermann_muenc...@hotmail.com<mailto:gpetermann_muenc...@hotmail.com>> wrote: Hi Ben, attached is my version of your approach. It adds the rule # Don't route through highway=construction, they are considered unusable highway=construction {setaccess no} at the very end of inc/access. This should work, but splits the special handling of highway=construction. Gerd ________________________________ Von: mkgmap-dev-boun...@lists.mkgmap.org.uk<mailto:mkgmap-dev-boun...@lists.mkgmap.org.uk> <mkgmap-dev-boun...@lists.mkgmap.org.uk<mailto:mkgmap-dev-boun...@lists.mkgmap.org.uk>> im Auftrag von Ben Konrath <b...@bagu.org<mailto:b...@bagu.org>> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 21. Oktober 2015 09:28 An: Development list for mkgmap Betreff: Re: [mkgmap-dev] [patch v1] don't route the highway=construction ways For people who have issues with Gerd's implement (line is in NET but not in NOD): What do you think about my original suggestion of adding "setaccess 'no';" to highway=construction? Thanks, Ben On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 11:38 AM, Gerd Petermann <gpetermann_muenc...@hotmail.com<mailto:gpetermann_muenc...@hotmail.com>> wrote: Hi Chris, glad to see that you did not use the mkgmap: prefix ;-) Gerd ________________________________________ Von: mkgmap-dev-boun...@lists.mkgmap.org.uk<mailto:mkgmap-dev-boun...@lists.mkgmap.org.uk> <mkgmap-dev-boun...@lists.mkgmap.org.uk<mailto:mkgmap-dev-boun...@lists.mkgmap.org.uk>> im Auftrag von chris66 <chris66...@gmx.de<mailto:chris66...@gmx.de>> Gesendet: Dienstag, 20. Oktober 2015 10:52 An: mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk<mailto:mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk> Betreff: Re: [mkgmap-dev] [patch v1] don't route the highway=construction ways Am 16.10.2015 um 20:46 schrieb Alexandre Loss: > I agree also that "mkgmap:ignore-for-routing=yes" is more clear. I used this tag already in OSM to mark isolated ways. :-) https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/111674198#map=18/54.3354/8.5915 Chris _______________________________________________ mkgmap-dev mailing list mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk<mailto:mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk> http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev _______________________________________________ mkgmap-dev mailing list mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk<mailto:mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk> http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev _______________________________________________ mkgmap-dev mailing list mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk<mailto:mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk> http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
construction_v3.patch
Description: construction_v3.patch
_______________________________________________ mkgmap-dev mailing list mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
