>From an English-speaking standpoint I would associate delivery (in the context of "no entry except for delivery" for example) with the purpose of your visit (i.e. to deliver something) but not specific to a particular sort of vehicle, and not in itself related to the possession of individual permission.
I would suggest mapping access=delivery to access=destination, i.e. no access unless you actually need to be there. I think that's about as close as you can get within the Garmin access model. --colin On 2016-02-14 13:38, Gerd Petermann wrote: > If I got that right, the rules in inc/access should be changed so that > > access=delivery (or variants like motorvehicle/ hgv/ motorcar etc ) is > treated similar to goods=yes ? > > Does anybody have working rules for this tag ? > > Gerd > > ------------------------- > > VON: [email protected] > <[email protected]> im Auftrag von Gerd Petermann > <[email protected]> > GESENDET: Sonntag, 14. Februar 2016 08:28 > AN: [email protected] > BETREFF: [mkgmap-dev] motorvehicle=delivery seems to be ignored ? > > Hi all, > > I found this thread on the talk list: > > http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/Routing-through-access-delivery-tt5867583.html > > I am about to answer there and a post a link to this forum. > > Gerd > _______________________________________________ > mkgmap-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
_______________________________________________ mkgmap-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
