See splitter r487 in the refactoring2 branch. ________________________________ Von: mkgmap-dev <[email protected]> im Auftrag von Steve Sgalowski <[email protected]> Gesendet: Sonntag, 4. Dezember 2016 10:51:47 An: Development list for mkgmap Betreff: Re: [mkgmap-dev] Size checks in splitter
it does to me , when i use a 3rd party program , that uses your files to split and combine but ok gerd I but out and just use the program and force it as always . Stephen On Sun, Dec 4, 2016 at 7:46 PM, Gerd Petermann <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Hi Stephen, please explain I don't see how the suggested change in splitter is related to this. Gerd ________________________________ Von: mkgmap-dev <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> im Auftrag von Steve Sgalowski <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Gesendet: Sonntag, 4. Dezember 2016 10:36:02 An: Development list for mkgmap Betreff: Re: [mkgmap-dev] Size checks in splitter when splitting Australia in the osm file of 7 gb in size , that would be usefull, as i set the max nodes to 90,000 to make smaller tiles as i get frequently , that there is not enough room in a single gmapsupp.img file to hold all the data . Stephen On Sun, Dec 4, 2016 at 7:28 PM, Gerd Petermann <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Hi all, years ago we added a check in splitter r251 to make sure that it doesn't write extremely large tiles. See http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/pipermail/mkgmap-dev/2012q1/013611.html and http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/pipermail/mkgmap-dev/2012q4/015707.html In short: The problem is that the precomp-sea option will add a huge amout of sea polygons to such a tile, another problem is that the bounds option loads a huge amount of data. I've now noticed that this check might not be useful if you use splitter to split a large file into a few smaller tiles, esp. the whole planet with num-tiles=2. I'd like to skip this check when a) --num-tiles is used b) --max-nodes value is large, e.g. higher than 10.000.000 Another option would be to add a new option like --skip-size-check. What do you think? Gerd _______________________________________________ mkgmap-dev mailing list [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev _______________________________________________ mkgmap-dev mailing list [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
_______________________________________________ mkgmap-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
