Hi Ticker, please review. I think the results at lower resolutions are worse compared to older versions. Example: Use 63240135.img and compare the results in GPSMapEdit. Zoom to 50 m and go to (Ctrl+G) 48.907440 13.471183. At level 1 the one half of the city park is lost.
In other places it seems to improve things, e.g. the soccer field near 48.906100 13.460832 no longer disappears at level 1. Gerd ________________________________________ Von: mkgmap-dev <[email protected]> im Auftrag von Ticker Berkin <[email protected]> Gesendet: Freitag, 27. Januar 2017 14:18:45 An: [email protected] Betreff: Re: [mkgmap-dev] Multipolygon-Relation checks in mkgmap Hi Gerd I've just committed something to split polygons early at high precision. It has become a work-in-progress to stop needless area splitting at low resolutions; hence I've left in comments and thoughts to myself that I'll gradually tidy up. Ticker _______________________________________________ mkgmap-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev _______________________________________________ mkgmap-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
