Hi David, the ways I am talking about are NOT part of the road. In many cases there is a ditch or tree row between the road and the cycleway, say 3-5 m width. The cycleway may make small turns around trees. So, I think it is okay to map those ways on their own but I don't know any tag which describes the fact that there is a major road next to it.
Gerd ________________________________________ Von: mkgmap-dev <[email protected]> im Auftrag von David <[email protected]> Gesendet: Freitag, 17. März 2017 16:59:15 An: [email protected] Betreff: Re: [mkgmap-dev] Parallel major roads to cycleways Features rules from Openstreetmap.org<http://Openstreetmap.org> says : "Cycling infrastructure that is an inherent part of a road - particularly "cycle lanes" which are a part of the road - should usually not be tagged as a separate cycleway, but by adding the cycleway<http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:cycleway>=* tag to an existing highway<http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:highway>=*instead." The problem, if there is one, seems to be on the mappers side, not mkgmap styles rules. It should be easy to discard any cycleway along a road with a condition test like (cycleway=* & highway!=*). You can refine it with a test on the road category if needed. Reference : http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dcycleway David _______________________________________________ mkgmap-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
