Hi Andrzej
Thanks for that.
However,
I find that Transparency still allows for DEM to be visible on the other
maps I create.
Interesting about the DEM having 5 layers and only 4 layers in my data
Again , this normally doesn't cause a problem but it is an issue.
I only include the dem files in the tdb when I upload the map to my
device. Basecamp doesn't seem to complain.
My point was , that for some strange reason the/.hgt file needed for
this area /gets ignored by BuildDEMfile , but not always - see below
Maps anywhere else don't cause a problem -
@ Frank
1) if I add dem files to kent-latest1.osm.pbf from, Geofabrik the
'missing' .hgt file gets included and*the**/whole of Kent /**displays DEM*
2) If I use the small map OR 68775599.osm.pbf then the problem happens
only the top part gets DEM - see picture
It perhaps has something to do with having to include a sea .hgt
r
Nick
On 23/11/2017 13:00, Andrzej Popowski wrote:
Hi Nick,
there are several problems with your map.
You have created a transparent map without background. I think
background object 0x4A is needed for DEM shading.
You have created DEM with 5 layers, while you got only 4 layers of
data in your map. Programs probably won't accept DEM with excessive
number of DEM layers.
TDB of your map doesn't contain references to DEM.
_______________________________________________
mkgmap-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
