Hi all, see http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/websvn/revision.php?repname=mkgmap&rev=4081
Please ignore run time of bicubic-spline method for now, I think optimized version should be as slow as bicubic, at the moment it is slower. Gerd ________________________________________ Von: mkgmap-dev <[email protected]> im Auftrag von osm@pinns <[email protected]> Gesendet: Dienstag, 23. Januar 2018 17:16:17 An: [email protected] Betreff: Re: [mkgmap-dev] DEM: performance with bicubic interpolation Hi Gerd and Andrzej I think that makes sense top make it more flexible. I found the following interpolation NearestNeighbor Bilinear BicubicCardinal BicubicBSpline BicubicBCSpline Nick On 23/01/2018 15:28, Andrzej Popowski wrote: > Hi Gerd, > > maybe we can wait a bit with optimization? What I would like to get is > an option for mkgamp, that will allow for testing quality of all these > versions of interpolation. For now we have bilinear, bicubic and > bicubic spline. This all could be included in code and selected by user. > _______________________________________________ mkgmap-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev _______________________________________________ mkgmap-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
