Thank you :-). Yesterday I had send a message to the Author Javier Sanchez
.....
thomas
--------------------------------------------------
Von: "Gerd Petermann" <[email protected]>
Datum: Mittwoch, 7. Februar 2018 06:24
An: "Development list for mkgmap" <[email protected]>
Betreff: Re: [mkgmap-dev] splitter r590,wrong handling of relations
Hi Thomas,
I've just fixed the relation [1], so please try again with a fresh
download tomorrow.
Gerd
[1] https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/56139020
________________________________________
Von: mkgmap-dev <[email protected]> im Auftrag von
Gerd Petermann <[email protected]>
Gesendet: Dienstag, 6. Februar 2018 14:47
An: Thomas Morgenstern; Development list for mkgmap
Betreff: Re: [mkgmap-dev] splitter r590,wrong handling of relations
Hi Thomas,
the relation is broken. Use JOSM validator and it will report 2 errors.
I think this way
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/556302821
should not belong to it and a few nodes should be merged to repiar it:
node 4298102908
node 4298102907
node 655141348
Gerd
________________________________________
Von: mkgmap-dev <[email protected]> im Auftrag von
Thomas Morgenstern <[email protected]>
Gesendet: Dienstag, 6. Februar 2018 14:35
An: Development list for mkgmap
Betreff: Re: [mkgmap-dev] splitter r590,wrong handling of relations
Hi Gerd, i have now made a different split, so that 1 tile contains the
whole isle. In this case it looks good. I assume, that the relation is
okay.
No idea what should be changed in data. Also i have looked before with
JOSM
in the old split and confirm, that in the left tile the relation also
exists, but not rendered from mkgmap. I can't judge, if the relation is
broken or not. Therefore the problem is in mkgmap ? I
thomas
--------------------------------------------------
Von: "Gerd Petermann" <[email protected]>
Datum: Dienstag, 6. Februar 2018 12:15
An: "Thomas Morgenstern" <[email protected]>; "Development list for
mkgmap" <[email protected]>
Betreff: Re: [mkgmap-dev] splitter r590,wrong handling of relations
Hi Thomas,
I think the problem is that the relation is broken. Splitter writes it to
both tiles, but
mkgmap seems to have problems with it.
Anyway, the problem is in the data and should be fixed in OSM.
Gerd
________________________________________
Von: mkgmap-dev <[email protected]> im Auftrag von
Thomas Morgenstern <[email protected]>
Gesendet: Dienstag, 6. Februar 2018 12:50
An: Development list for mkgmap
Betreff: [mkgmap-dev] splitter r590,wrong handling of relations
Hi Gerd, i found out, that splitter r590 can not proper handle the
relation
2.691.138. I can reproduce the problem. It makes no different, if I
splitt
the canary-islands-latest.osm.pbf with the default-option or with my own
splitt.list. If I move the tileborder by changing the nord-south border,
also the problem is moved. See picture at
http://img2ms.de/OSM/ErrorInSplitter-r590.jpg. At the tile-boundary
splitter
creates only for the rightsite tile the polygon for tag
boundary=protected_area , respektive leisure=nature_reserve. In the
leftsite-tile this tags are missing.
maybee you can have a look at that ?
regards thomas
_______________________________________________
mkgmap-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
_______________________________________________
mkgmap-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
_______________________________________________
mkgmap-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
_______________________________________________
mkgmap-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
_______________________________________________
mkgmap-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
_______________________________________________
mkgmap-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
