Hi Gerd
When mkgmap added --gmapi option I did some test and found that mkgmap (without --gmapi)+gmapi-builder was a little faster than mkgmap with --gmapi, that's why I continued using gmapi-builder. Perhaps it's time to change my toolchain (I alredy did for DEM maps)

El 09/02/18 a las 19:43, Gerd Petermann escribió:
Hi Carlos,

maybe gmapi-builder.py cannot handle block sizes <> 512?
Why do you that tool and not the --gmapi option ?


Von: mkgmap-dev <mkgmap-dev-boun...@lists.mkgmap.org.uk> im Auftrag von Carlos Dávila 
Gesendet: Freitag, 9. Februar 2018 19:40
An: Development list for mkgmap
Betreff: [mkgmap-dev] Problem with gmapi-builder

Since mkgmap r4092 I get errors like "Missing part: 0 of GARMIN .RGN in
IMG-file" or "Missing part: 0 of ~�?�.�� in IMG-file" when I use
gmapi-builder.py to transform maps to gmap format. r4091 works fine with
Resulting *.gmapi folder is almost empty with r4092 and above.

mkgmap-dev mailing list

Reply via email to