Hi Gerd
When mkgmap added --gmapi option I did some test and found that mkgmap
(without --gmapi)+gmapi-builder was a little faster than mkgmap with
--gmapi, that's why I continued using gmapi-builder. Perhaps it's time
to change my toolchain (I alredy did for DEM maps)
El 09/02/18 a las 19:43, Gerd Petermann escribió:
Hi Carlos,
maybe gmapi-builder.py cannot handle block sizes <> 512?
Why do you that tool and not the --gmapi option ?
Gerd
________________________________________
Von: mkgmap-dev <[email protected]> im Auftrag von Carlos Dávila
<[email protected]>
Gesendet: Freitag, 9. Februar 2018 19:40
An: Development list for mkgmap
Betreff: [mkgmap-dev] Problem with gmapi-builder
Since mkgmap r4092 I get errors like "Missing part: 0 of GARMIN .RGN in
IMG-file" or "Missing part: 0 of ~�?�.�� in IMG-file" when I use
gmapi-builder.py to transform maps to gmap format. r4091 works fine with
gmapi-builder.
Resulting *.gmapi folder is almost empty with r4092 and above.
_______________________________________________
mkgmap-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
