Routing is only in resolution 24. If you put that information into other resolution it is ignored.
On Thu, 19 Sep 2019 at 11:51, Ticker Berkin <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi > > Not an answer to your question, but maybe relevant: > > The default style has, in "options": > levels = 0:24, 1:22, 2:20, 3:18 > > My reading of the "Style Conversion Manual" says that elements with > a resolution between the levels are included in the higher res/lower > level map; ie. elements with [resolution xx-23] go into the level 0 > map. > > So, according to this, you will be getting 2 lines on top of each other > at the most detailed level. > > If this isn't the case, the manual should be clarified. > > Regard > Ticker > > On Thu, 2019-09-19 at 00:31 -0700, nwillink wrote: > > Hi All > > > > I noticed default style uses extended types for roundabouts with a > > matching > > routable line. However > > extended lines are plotted starting at a lower resolution, ie > > > > Resolution 24 > > junction=roundabout & (highway=trunk | highway=trunk_link) [0x0c > > road_class=4 road_speed=2 resolution 24 continue] > > Resoiution 18 > > junction=roundabout & (highway=trunk | highway=trunk_link) [0x10801 > > resolution 18] > > > > In this case it does not seem to matter if 0x0c starts at resolution > > 24 > > rather than 18, or does it? > > > > Can we presume that all routable lines only require resolution 24 , > > ie > > > > a) highway=motorway [0x100 resolution 16-20 continue] # thinnest > > line > > b) highway=motorway [0x101 resolution 21-23 continue] # thinner line > > c) highway=motorway [0x01 road_class=4 road_speed=7 resolution 24] # > > default > > line > > > > Will this affect routing across tiles ? > > > > At the moment I'm adding a transparent routable line to a & b ie > > > > a) highway=motorway [0x100 resolution 16-20 continue] # thinnest > > line > > highway=motorway [0x17 road_class=4 road_speed=7 resolution 16-20 > > continue] > > b) highway=motorway [0x101 resolution 21-23 continue] # thinner line > > highway=motorway [0x17 road_class=4 road_speed=7 resolution 21-23 > > continue] > > > > Any ideas? > > > > Thanks > > > > Nick > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Sent from: > > http://gis.19327.n8.nabble.com/Mkgmap-Development-f5324443.html > > _______________________________________________ > > mkgmap-dev mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev > _______________________________________________ > mkgmap-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev > -- Felix Hartman - Openmtbmap.org & VeloMap.org Schusterbergweg 32/8 6020 Innsbruck Austria - Österreich
_______________________________________________ mkgmap-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
