Hi Ticker,

reg. Mdr12: I am pretty sure this is no longer used. I don't remember the 
details but I think it cannot work with unicode maps.
I guess with "makes no sense" you mean the strange loop with increment of 10240?
And sorry, it is not related to --location-autofill option. This is only needed 
to reach the code where the KdTree is used to locate the nearest city.

For me, city search by name also doesn't work, but I do find e.g. x2e13 in "all 
POI" as well as "shopping". Also very interesting for me is that the search for 
restaurants works fast on my Oregon, while it doesn't with normal maps.  So, 
I'll play with this, maybe I can find out the trigger.

Gerd

________________________________________
Von: mkgmap-dev <mkgmap-dev-boun...@lists.mkgmap.org.uk> im Auftrag von Gerd 
Petermann <gpetermann_muenc...@hotmail.com>
Gesendet: Freitag, 8. November 2019 15:44
An: Ticker Berkin; Development list for mkgmap
Betreff: Re: [mkgmap-dev] type/subtype of points and cities

Hi Ticker,

I'll have a look at this later. I think you need --location-autofill=nearest to 
fill MDR12

Gerd

________________________________________
Von: mkgmap-dev <mkgmap-dev-boun...@lists.mkgmap.org.uk> im Auftrag von Ticker 
Berkin <rwb-mkg...@jagit.co.uk>
Gesendet: Freitag, 8. November 2019 12:58
An: Development list for mkgmap
Betreff: Re: [mkgmap-dev] type/subtype of points and cities

Hi Gerd

Here is patch to do these things.

I can't get find-by-name (ie MDR searches) to work (neither POI nor
Cities), but I don't think it ever has done.

I did a bit of diagnostics and it generates the same MDR sections as a
normal map except it doesn't generate:

Mdr6  zips
Mdr7  street names
Mdr12 index into Mdr11
Mdr20 streets
Mdr22 streets by country

This is as expected except for the missing MDR12. The logic for the
generation of this is in Mdr11:getIndex() and makes no sense, but
hacking it a bit to generate more than 1 record made no difference.

Ticker

On Thu, 2019-11-07 at 13:15 +0000, Ticker Berkin wrote:
> Hi Gerd
>
> Yes, I'll change allElements to not try subtypes for isCityType, and,
> elsewhere, assert that indPoints don't have a subtype.
>
> My Etrex only shows points in the range you mention in the results
> for
> nearby cities, but doing a spell search it finds whatever is in the
> appropriate MDR - presume group 0 in MDR 10.
>
> I find it a useful feature (for UK postcodes) - having a point that
> can
> be searched for by name but doesn't swamp the 'nearby' display.
> City search seemed to be the only place I could do this and the
> various
> old city range definitions allowed it anyway.
>
> Ticker
>
> On Thu, 2019-11-07 at 12:51 +0000, Gerd Petermann wrote:
> > Hi Ticker,
> >
> > maybe allElements should only produce POIs for types acepted by
> > GTYpe.checkType()?
> > When I do that I see no crashes in MapSource but the MdrCheck still
> > complains about some mdr11 entries.
> >
> > Reg. MapPoint.isCityType():
> > According to MapSource only type 0x0100 .. 0x0d00 are cities (and
> > subtype must be zero)
> > When I use "Find Nearest  Places" in Mapsource it doesn't show the
> > other types when I limit the search to cities.
> >
> > Gerd
> >
> > ________________________________________
> > Von: mkgmap-dev <mkgmap-dev-boun...@lists.mkgmap.org.uk> im Auftrag
> > von Gerd Petermann <gpetermann_muenc...@hotmail.com>
> > Gesendet: Donnerstag, 7. November 2019 13:18
> > An: Ticker Berkin; mkgmap development
> > Betreff: Re: [mkgmap-dev] type/subtype of points and cities
> >
> > Hi Ticker,
> >
> > the problems with AllElements are not new. I see them also with
> > much
> > older versions of mkgmap.
> >
> > Gerd
> >
> > ________________________________________
> > Von: mkgmap-dev <mkgmap-dev-boun...@lists.mkgmap.org.uk> im Auftrag
> > von Ticker Berkin <rwb-mkg...@jagit.co.uk>
> > Gesendet: Donnerstag, 7. November 2019 12:56
> > An: mkgmap development
> > Betreff: Re: [mkgmap-dev] type/subtype of points and cities
> >
> > Hi Gerd
> >
> > MdrDisplay/cityPtrSize:
> >
> > I didn't change any significant behaviour. Because it seemed
> > inconsistent, I put in a diagnostic. I also made the switch stmt in
> > printSec11_city like the similar instances that do have to handle
> > 1/2/3
> > byte objects rather than switch ... case 3: ... default: ...
> >
> > I should also have added handling cityPtrSize of 4. I fixed mkgmap
> > to
> > work correctly for this. However, when I get a tile that needs 4
> > byte
> > pointers, the gmapsupp.img size jumps up, so I re-split the map
> > with
> > a
> > different number of nodes until the city count reduces again.
> >
> > My preference here would be rename one of the cityPtrSize variables
> > and
> > keep/extend the switch statement. Happy to get rid of the
> > test/system.out.printf
> >
> > MdrCheck/group/toType:
> >
> > The original code in check10() tried to re-constitute a
> > type/subtype
> > as
> > per mkgmap from group/someBits data and it didn't do it fully or
> > correctly.
> >
> > I agree that this tool should just display/validate the
> > understanding
> > of the Garmin IMG structure. However, in this case, because the
> > fullType generated above is then validated against data from mdr11,
> > it
> > has to do this validation based on the grouping chosen by mkgmap.
> > Similarly, if these mappings are changed in mkgmap, equivalent
> > changes
> > need to be made to Display (I put in a few comments to this effect
> > in
> > the relevant places)
> >
> > AllElements:
> >
> > On my Etrex device, it shows some points not in the correct place
> > according to sequence with strange types or names. Some of these
> > points
> > are outside the map area! I can't quite remember the details, it
> > has
> > been a while since I last used it.
> >
> > So yes, I'm sure it is generating something it shouldn't and maybe
> > the
> > lower levels of mkgmap code should be checking/objecting as well.
> > It
> > might be related to indPoints sometimes having subtypes; I think
> > there
> > are assumptions that these are a fixed size items.
> >
> > I don't know if this will cause the problems you describe, but I'll
> > have a look at it.
> >
> > Ticker
> >
> >
> > On Thu, 2019-11-07 at 09:15 +0000, Gerd Petermann wrote:
> > > Hi Ticker,
> > >
> > > I've not yet understood the changes regarding cityPtrSize. Do you
> > > think that Garmin supports one-byte pointers when there are less
> > > than
> > > 128 cities?
> > > The transalpin demo map contains only a few cities or regions but
> > > uses two  bytes.
> > > I've attached a patch with my proposed changes.
> > >
> > > One more hint:
> > > I don't like the description "Understands the same MDR groups as
> > > generated by mkgmap so it can recreate the correct full type."
> > > My understanding of display tool is this:
> > > - The main purpose is to find out how the Garmin algos encode
> > > things
> > > in IMG format, so we should use maps produced by Garmin and
> > > Mapsource/Basecamp to verify. The code in mkgmap should be the
> > > results of those findings, not vice versa.
> > > - I also use it to verify that changes made in mkgmap don't do
> > > something unexpected.
> > >
> > > I've just learned that Mapsource doesn't like the map produced
> > > with
> > > java -jar mkgmap.jar --index --gmapi test-map:all-elements
> > > It crashes when you search for all POI and also when you search
> > > for
> > > cities (both without giving a name)
> > >
> > > Gerd
> > >
> > > ________________________________________
> > > Von: mkgmap-dev <mkgmap-dev-boun...@lists.mkgmap.org.uk> im
> > > Auftrag
> > > von Ticker Berkin <rwb-mkg...@jagit.co.uk>
> > > Gesendet: Dienstag, 5. November 2019 12:44
> > > An: mkgmap development
> > > Betreff: Re: [mkgmap-dev] type/subtype of points and cities
> > >
> > > Hi Gerd
> > >
> > > Here is patch for Display.
> > >
> > > Changes are:
> > >   Couple of extra diagnostics.
> > >   Handles 1 byte cities.
> > >   Moves a call of getSection(11).get... out of a loop.
> > >   Consistent handling/display of point type/subtype.
> > >   Understands the same MDR groups as generated by mkgmap so
> > >     it can recreate the correct full type.
> > >
> > > Ticker
> > >
> > > On Tue, 2019-11-05 at 09:43 +0000, Gerd Petermann wrote:
> > > > Hi Ticker,
> > > >
> > > > okay, looks good to me. In an earlier post you mentioned that
> > > > display
> > > > tool needs changes, too. Please post that patch as well.
> > > >
> > > > Gerd
> > > >
> > > > ________________________________________
> > > > Von: mkgmap-dev <mkgmap-dev-boun...@lists.mkgmap.org.uk> im
> > > > Auftrag
> > > > von Ticker Berkin <rwb-mkg...@jagit.co.uk>
> > > > Gesendet: Montag, 4. November 2019 18:12
> > > > An: Development list for mkgmap
> > > > Betreff: Re: [mkgmap-dev] type/subtype of points and cities
> > > >
> > > > Hi Gerd
> > > >
> > > > To stay compatible with "Openfietsmap full" style, I've updated
> > > > the
> > > > patch to change the range of city to be:
> > > >   type >= 0x0100 && type < 0x1100;
> > > > Release mkgmap had this as:
> > > >   type >= 0x0100 && type <= 0x1100;
> > > >
> > > > In release mkgmap, a point with value 0x1100 was added to the
> > > > RGN
> > > > as
> > > > an
> > > > indPoint, but not indexed as a city by MDR. Also 0x1100 is not
> > > > findable
> > > > as a nearby city, at least on Garmin eTrex. I couldn't detect
> > > > any
> > > > useful behaviour for this combination.
> > > >
> > > > Ticker
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, 2019-10-22 at 15:03 +0000, Gerd Petermann wrote:
> > > > > Hi Minko,
> > > > >
> > > > > "(like you say)" should have been ... "(like Ticker wrote)"
> > > > > ... (a small dot with the label) ...
> > > > > sorry, I forgot to use the typ file, so 0x1101 is displayed
> > > > > with
> > > > > an
> > > > > icon showing a bus and without the label.
> > > > > But why do you use a type that is not indexed?
> > > > >
> > > > > Gerd
> > > > >
> > > > > ________________________________________
> > > > > Von: mkgmap-dev <mkgmap-dev-boun...@lists.mkgmap.org.uk> im
> > > > > Auftrag
> > > > > von Gerd Petermann <gpetermann_muenc...@hotmail.com>
> > > > > Gesendet: Dienstag, 22. Oktober 2019 16:52
> > > > > An: Development list for mkgmap
> > > > > Betreff: Re: [mkgmap-dev] type/subtype of points and cities
> > > > >
> > > > > Hi Ticker,
> > > > >
> > > > > thanks.
> > > > >
> > > > >  @Minko:
> > > > > I've created a small map with "Openfietsmap full" style and
> > > > > trunk
> > > > > r4315 , OSM data contains an amenity=bus_station.
> > > > > The result is that this POI appears in the map (a small dot
> > > > > with
> > > > > the
> > > > > label), but it is not in the mdr (like you say).
> > > > > I found no older versions of mkgmap where this would have
> > > > > worked
> > > > > different, so it seems useless to me because normally I'd
> > > > > want
> > > > > to
> > > > > be
> > > > > able to find the bus station under transport services.
> > > > >
> > > > > Why do you use 0x1101, 0x1102, or 0x1108 for POI?
> > > > >
> > > > > Gerd
> > > > >
> > > > > ________________________________________
> > > > > Von: mkgmap-dev <mkgmap-dev-boun...@lists.mkgmap.org.uk> im
> > > > > Auftrag
> > > > > von Ticker Berkin <rwb-mkg...@jagit.co.uk>
> > > > > Gesendet: Dienstag, 22. Oktober 2019 16:29
> > > > > An: Development list for mkgmap
> > > > > Betreff: Re: [mkgmap-dev] type/subtype of points and cities
> > > > >
> > > > > Hi Gerd
> > > > >
> > > > > The old reader/osm/Gtype:checkType() didn't diagnose cities
> > > > > (however
> > > > > they might be defined) with non-zero subtypes - this is where
> > > > > the
> > > > > new
> > > > > message comes from.
> > > > >
> > > > > Old general/MapPoint:isCity[Type] defined city as:
> > > > >
> > > > >         return type >= 0x0100 && type <= 0x1100
> > > > >
> > > > > ie 0x1100 is city, 0x1101 isn't, which I thought wasn't a
> > > > > good
> > > > > definition, so I changed it to:
> > > > >
> > > > >         return type >= 0x0100 && type < 0x1200;
> > > > >
> > > > > I chose all of 0x11XX to be considered cities so that 0x1100
> > > > > processing
> > > > > as a city didn't change (this and 0x1000 were put into RGN
> > > > > indPoints,
> > > > > but were not indexed as cities by MDR)
> > > > >
> > > > > Changing it to < 0x1100 would be reasonable, because the
> > > > > device
> > > > > range
> > > > > seems to be < 0x0e00 and MDR5 city indexing was for points <
> > > > > 0x1000
> > > > >
> > > > > Ticker
> > > > >
> > > > > On Tue, 2019-10-22 at 12:32 +0000, Gerd Petermann wrote:
> > > > > > Hi Ticker,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I see some new warnings for Minkos popular Openfietsmap
> > > > > > styles
> > > > > > with
> > > > > > this patch:
> > > > > > checking style: Openfietsmap full
> > > > > > Warning: invalid type 0x1101 for POINT in style file
> > > > > > points,
> > > > > > line
> > > > > > 97
> > > > > > Warning: invalid type 0x1102 for POINT in style file
> > > > > > points,
> > > > > > line
> > > > > > 263
> > > > > > Warning: invalid type 0x1102 for POINT in style file
> > > > > > points,
> > > > > > line
> > > > > > 264
> > > > > > Warning: invalid type 0x1108 for POINT in style file
> > > > > > points,
> > > > > > line
> > > > > > 336
> > > > > > Warning: invalid type 0x1108 for POINT in style file
> > > > > > points,
> > > > > > line
> > > > > > 348
> > > > > > Warning: invalid type 0x1108 for POINT in style file
> > > > > > points,
> > > > > > line
> > > > > > 349
> > > > > > Warning: invalid type 0x1108 for POINT in style file
> > > > > > points,
> > > > > > line
> > > > > > 350
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The corresponding lines in the points file
> > > > > > amenity=bus_station [0x1101 resolution 24 continue]
> > > > > > railway=halt [0x1102 resolution 22]
> > > > > > railway=station [0x1102 resolution 20-23 continue]
> > > > > > (barrier=bollard | barrier=bus_trap | barrier=block)
> > > > > > [0x1108
> > > > > > resolution 23]
> > > > > > access:conditional=* & access:conditional ~
> > > > > > '!(sunset|sunrise|destination)' & bicycle!=no &
> > > > > > bicycle!=permissive
> > > > > > &
> > > > > > vehicle!=no { name 'access=${access:conditional}' } [0x1108
> > > > > > resolution 24]
> > > > > > bicycle:conditional=* & bicycle:conditional ~
> > > > > > '!(sunset|sunrise|destination)' { name
> > > > > > 'bicycle=${bicycle:conditional}' } [0x1108 resolution 24]
> > > > > > vehicle:conditional=* & vehicle:conditional ~
> > > > > > '!(sunset|sunrise|destination)' { name
> > > > > > 'vehicle=${vehicle:conditional}' } [0x1108 resolution 24]
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Can you explain what happened with those POI without the
> > > > > > patch?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Gerd
> > > > > >
> > > > > > ________________________________________
> > > > > > Von: mkgmap-dev <mkgmap-dev-boun...@lists.mkgmap.org.uk> im
> > > > > > Auftrag
> > > > > > von Ticker Berkin <rwb-mkg...@jagit.co.uk>
> > > > > > Gesendet: Dienstag, 22. Oktober 2019 13:07
> > > > > > An: Development list for mkgmap
> > > > > > Betreff: Re: [mkgmap-dev] type/subtype of points and cities
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Hi Gerd
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Here is the patch based on the current trunk
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Ticker
> > > > > > On Tue, 2019-04-23 at 11:51 +0100, Ticker Berkin wrote:
> > > > > > > Hi
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I think the mkgmap internal handling of types/subtypes of
> > > > > > > points
> > > > > > > is
> > > > > > > obscure.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > In the points style file, the type code is always full,
> > > > > > > ie
> > > > > > > type
> > > > > > > <<
> > > > > > > 8
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > subtype, but when the points are read back from the RGN
> > > > > > > file
> > > > > > > for
> > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > MDR processing, the representation is the same provided
> > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > subtype
> > > > > > > is
> > > > > > > not zero, otherwise it is just type! Logic then decides
> > > > > > > that
> > > > > > > if
> > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > value is <= 0xff it is because the subtype is zero.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > It is simpler and much clearer to preserve the original
> > > > > > > representation.
> > > > > > > This also allows unambiguous use of type 0 with subtypes,
> > > > > > > and,
> > > > > > > possibly, city with subtypes.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > It also allows the same function to be used to test a
> > > > > > > type
> > > > > > > for
> > > > > > > being
> > > > > > > in
> > > > > > > the 'city' range, regardless of the context. mkgmap
> > > > > > > wasn't
> > > > > > > consistent
> > > > > > > the ranges for the isCity test.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > City POI are written in a different manner to the RGN
> > > > > > > file.
> > > > > > > The
> > > > > > > old
> > > > > > > range for this was:
> > > > > > >   type >= 0x0100 && type <= 0x1100
> > > > > > > which I've kept, except changing to: ...& type < 0x1200.
> > > > > > > A
> > > > > > > similar
> > > > > > > range was used for MDR5.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > However, city POI are held in group 1 of MDR 9/10. This
> > > > > > > is
> > > > > > > used
> > > > > > > in
> > > > > > > Find
> > > > > > > > City 'By Name'. The old range was: type <= 0xf, where,
> > > > > > > > if
> > > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > subtype
> > > > > > > was zero, type is right shifted by 8 (see above), non
> > > > > > > -zero
> > > > > > > subtypes
> > > > > > > messed up the testing. Now it uses the same range as
> > > > > > > above.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Actually neither of these ranges are correct for my
> > > > > > > Garmin
> > > > > > > devices.
> > > > > > > Find > City show nearby POI with types in the range
> > > > > > > 0x0100..0x0d1f,
> > > > > > > regardless of the img RGN or MDR. The eTrex Legend labels
> > > > > > > POIs
> > > > > > > in
> > > > > > > this
> > > > > > > range as {Large/Medium/Small} City/Town and points in the
> > > > > > > range
> > > > > > > 0x0e00..0x111f as "*".
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Find > City 'by-name' returns POI if in group 1 of MDR
> > > > > > > 9/10.
> > > > > > > I
> > > > > > > find
> > > > > > > it
> > > > > > > a useful feature to have a POI that can be searched for
> > > > > > > but
> > > > > > > doesn't
> > > > > > > flood the list of nearby points.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Generally, non-zero subtypes for cities cause problems in
> > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > RGN
> > > > > > > structure and I've added a test for this to the style
> > > > > > > validation.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > There is also a fix to --make-poi-index, but I can't
> > > > > > > detect
> > > > > > > any
> > > > > > > effect
> > > > > > > of this option.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > This patch won't make any difference to the img output
> > > > > > > unless
> > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > there
> > > > > > > are points 0x1000, 0x1100.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > If this patch is accepted, I'll do the equivalent to the
> > > > > > > img
> > > > > > > display
> > > > > > > system.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Regards
> > > > > > > Ticker
> > > > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > > > mkgmap-dev mailing list
> > > > > > > mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk
> > > > > > > http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
> > > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > > mkgmap-dev mailing list
> > > > > > mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk
> > > > > > http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
> > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > mkgmap-dev mailing list
> > > > > mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk
> > > > > http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
> > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > mkgmap-dev mailing list
> > > > > mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk
> > > > > http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
> > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > mkgmap-dev mailing list
> > > > > mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk
> > > > > http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
> > _______________________________________________
> > mkgmap-dev mailing list
> > mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk
> > http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
> > _______________________________________________
> > mkgmap-dev mailing list
> > mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk
> > http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
> _______________________________________________
> mkgmap-dev mailing list
> mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk
> http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
_______________________________________________
mkgmap-dev mailing list
mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk
http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
_______________________________________________
mkgmap-dev mailing list
mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk
http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev

Reply via email to