Hi
I have this in my style:
railway=abandoned & highway!=* &
((bicycle=* & bicycle!=no & bicycle!=proposed) |
(foot=* & foot!=no & foot!=proposed))
{set highway=path}
highway=path might be converted by later rules to bridleway, footway or
cycleway
Ticker
On Sat, 2020-01-18 at 18:51 +0000, Gerd Petermann wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> the default style has this rule:
> # following really should be removed, but see:
> http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/pipermail/mkgmap-dev/2016q3/025104.html
> railway=abandoned [0x0a road_class=0 road_speed=1 resolution 22]
>
> I agree with Ticker that it is not a good idea to make such a way
> routable. I would accept this when it has also a tag like
> bicycle=yes. I found a few ways like this, e.g.
> https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/122268824 (I wonder why nobody
> added a highway tag since 2011)
> BUT we should not assume access=yes for a railway=abandoned. So, what
> about this:
> railway=abandoned {add access=no} [0x0a road_class=0 road_speed=1
> resolution 22]
>
> Gerd
> _______________________________________________
> mkgmap-dev mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
_______________________________________________
mkgmap-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
