Gerd Petermann wrote > Ticker Berkin wrote >> I suggest replacing ANY_IN_OR_ON with SOME_OUT_NONE_IN, giving it the >> method string "none", like SOME_IN_NONE_OUT is referenced as "all". > > Yes, much better.
Thinking again about it. What would be the difference between is_in(..all)=true and is_in(..none)=false? My understanding is that we want to distinguish 5 or 6 cases. Three methods returning true or false should be enough for that. Gerd -- Sent from: http://gis.19327.n8.nabble.com/Mkgmap-Development-f5324443.html _______________________________________________ mkgmap-dev mailing list mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
