I missed the [motor_vehicle=no] on the residential (south way only).
My example should haven been without any access tags on the highways.
Just: [highway=residential] + [barrier=bollard] in the middle.
But you have "removed the tag motor_vehicle=no from way"
Oké, so: your test is okay!
IF:
- NODE: [barrier=bollard] + [motor_vehicle=no]
THEN:
- nearby-poi-rules
THEN:
- NODE: [motor_vehicle=no]
So: only [barrier=bollard] was deleted from node?
So not all tags {deletealltags} are deleted, only the POI tag?!!
Oké than routing - restriction (!) - is not effected by nearby-poi-rules.
Agreed.
But this also implies name=* is left on node (if name is set).
How will Map render a node having name only?
Osmose and JOSM regards this as warning: "missing tag - incomplete object:
only name".
Also (but OT):
The barrier rendered is a - visual - justification for GPS refusing to Route
over this highway.
If the barrier is missing (not rendered by nearby-poi-rules) than I might
assume this is an "Unconnected ways" error and I can go there by ignoring
GPS.
I won't understand why routing is not possible.
So "visual navigation" might be effected by nearby-poi-rules. Walking the
dog over a cattle grid is another example.
> So, unless your Garmin navi interprets the POI itself as a routing
> restriction there really should be no effect on routing.
Unless I'm very mistaken:
mkgmap was updated several years ago as to "interprets the POI itself as a
routing restriction" (Instruction by openfietsmap).
My navi is innocent.
--
Sent from: http://gis.19327.n8.nabble.com/Mkgmap-Development-f5324443.html
_______________________________________________
mkgmap-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
