HI Joris,
I do not think we should be hard coding non-standard tags into mkgmap, even
if there are a number of them in some countries.
cycleway:left=opposite, cycleway:left=opposite_lane and
cycleway:left=opposite_track are all non-standard and to me don't make any
sense.
I suggest you add something like
cycleway:left=opposite | cycleway:left=opposite_lane |
cycleway:left=opposite_track | cycleway:right=opposite | cycleway:right
=opposite_lane | cycleway:right =opposite_track { add cycleway=opposite } to
your lines file if you want to use them.
Cheers,
Mike
-----Original Message-----
From: Joris Bo [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: 09 February 2021 11:09
To: Development list for mkgmap <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [mkgmap-dev] opposite-cycleways option
Hi Gerd,
Indeed short way of saying cycleway:left=opposite_lane or
cycleway:left=opposite_track
Like you have
cycleway=opposite |
cycleway=opposite_lane |
cycleway=opposite_track |
I would also think the others are enough but when I checked taginfo it is
more commonly used then cycleway:left=opposite_track
So seems valid to me...
Met vriendelijke groeten,
Joris Bo
[email protected]
-----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
Van: mkgmap-dev <[email protected]> Namens Gerd
Petermann
Verzonden: dinsdag 9 februari 2021 10:37
Aan: Development list for mkgmap <[email protected]>
Onderwerp: Re: [mkgmap-dev] opposite-cycleways option
Hi Joris,
I just wonder what cycleway:left=opposite means. Same with the already
supported cycleway:left=opposite_lane. Do you know a place where this makes
sense?
Gerd
________________________________________
Von: mkgmap-dev <[email protected]> im Auftrag von
Joris Bo <[email protected]>
Gesendet: Dienstag, 9. Februar 2021 10:20
An: Development list for mkgmap
Betreff: Re: [mkgmap-dev] opposite-cycleways option
Hi Gerd,
I came accross tagging
cycleway:left=opposite
cycleway:right=opposite
Overpass says that there are about 3200 ways in France/Belgium for this
situation
These are not mentioned in your e-mail post as possible tagging to create
synthesize roads, if I'am correct Would it be possible to add these options?
Mentioned in your post
oneway:bicycle=no |
bicycle:oneway=no |
cycleway=opposite |
cycleway=opposite_lane |
cycleway=opposite_track |
cycleway:left=opposite_lane |
cycleway:right=opposite_lane |
cycleway:left=opposite_track |
cycleway:right=opposite_track
Met vriendelijke groeten,
Joris Bo
[email protected]
-----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
Van: mkgmap-dev <[email protected]> Namens Gerd
Petermann
Verzonden: maandag 8 februari 2021 16:17
Aan: Development list for mkgmap <[email protected]>
Onderwerp: Re: [mkgmap-dev] opposite-cycleways option
Hi Joris,
the java code creates a copy of the original way and removes various
possibly existing access tags, it sets access=no,
bicycle=yes,oneway=no,mkgmap:synthesised=yes
I would not add foot=* as the original might have something equivalent to
foot=no.
In fact there should be no need for any special handling in the style unless
you want to assign a special typ.
Gerd
________________________________________
Von: mkgmap-dev <[email protected]> im Auftrag von
Joris Bo <[email protected]>
Gesendet: Montag, 8. Februar 2021 13:30
An: Development list for mkgmap
Betreff: [mkgmap-dev] opposite-cycleways option
Hi,
I'm trying to improve routing for my bicycle and the oneway allowed for
bicycles by using the --make-opposite-cycleway option But I was wondering
what the criteria are for creating such extra cycleways.
I have read some earlier posts an 'll found Gerd's comments on
http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/pipermail/mkgmap-dev/2014q2/020818.html
But the manual does not state what is actually implemented. Is there some
more documentation somewhere?
As far as I understand now
* Only if a highway has oneway=yes AND (some variants of oneway:bicycle
= no) then
* Mkgmap will create an extra highway line with (mkgmap:synthesised =
yes)
* Within my style file I'll pick up the mkgmap:synthesised=yes and
assign an "invisible overlay routeable highway" line and then
* Remove the oneway-tag (which applies to cars)
* set mkgmap:bicycle/foot=yes
* set mkgmap:car/hgv/bus/delivery=no
Is that correct?
Thx for helping me out
Met vriendelijke groeten,
Joris Bo
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
_______________________________________________
mkgmap-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
_______________________________________________
mkgmap-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
_______________________________________________
mkgmap-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
_______________________________________________
mkgmap-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
