(Still problems with attachments. Now with link)
Hi Ticker,
I want to ask for relevant swimmings, one after another, and after every rule
exclude further swimmings inside aleady matched areas.
In the end the style should dismiss e.g. leisure=swimming_pools which lay in a
(leisure=stadium & sport=swimming) already matched:
1. leisure=stadium & sport=swimming {name '${name} (stadium swim)‘ |
'(stadium swim)'} [0x2d09 resolution 24]
sport=swimming & is_in(leisure,stadium,in_or_on)=true &
is_in(sport,swimming,in_or_on)=true {delete sport}
2. leisure=water_park & sport=swimming {name '${name} (waterpark swim)‘ |
'(waterpark swim)'} [0x2d09 resolution 24]
sport=swimming & is_in(leisure, water_park,in_or_on)=true &
is_in(sport,swimming,in_or_on)=true {delete sport}
3. leisure=swimming_pool & sport=swimming {name '${name} (pool swim)‘ |
‚(pool swim)'} [0x2d09 resolution 24]
sport=swimming & is_in(leisure, swimming_pool,in_or_on)=true &
is_in(sport,swimming,in_or_on)=true {delete sport}
4. …
With the above ruleset I have correct results for nodes so far, but not for
polygons.
The is_in-rule seems to lack the epression of is_n(leisure=stadium &
sport=swimming), instead matches a polygons own swimming as well - what I don´t
want.
But I´ve got no clue how to write it.
In swim.osm the surrounding left stadium has swimming, the right one not.
Inside both stadium, water_park and sports_centre as area and poi. (See
http://files.mkgmap.org.uk/detail/500 for the following screenshots)
Above ruleset gives this: 1-result.jpg
In left stadium pois for stadium/swim (area, area inside, poi inside), nothing
else: correct.
In right stadium pois for all swim inside except for the areas: wrong.
What I expect is this: 2-expected.jpg
Left as before, but In the right pois for all swim inside including areas.
Hope I made it clearer
Jan
> Am 21.02.2021 um 13:01 schrieb Ticker Berkin <[email protected]
> <mailto:[email protected]>>:
>
> Hi Jan
>
> I'm slightly confused as to what you are trying to do here when you say
> it works for nodes but not polygons.
>
> After you've output a POI from the first rule what are you trying to
> do?
>
> Ticker
>
> On Sun, 2021-02-21 at 10:42 +0100, jan meisters wrote:
>> Hi Gerd,
>>
>> my first impression didn´t get trough further test.
>>
>> This works for nodes, but not for polygons:
>> leisure=stadium & sport=swimming [0x2d09 resolution 24]
>> sport=swimming & is_in(leisure,stadium,in_or_on)=true &
>> is_in(sport,swimming,in_or_on)=true {delete sport}
>>
>> It matches it´s own swimming tag as well, not only when stadium is
>> given.
>> Tried various spellings/brackets, but I can´t get it to work for
>> stadium and swimming as a combination only.
>> I guess we don´t have a syntax for this?
>>
>> Attached a small example.
>>
>> Jan
>>
>>
>>> Am 16.02.2021 um 18:28 schrieb jan meisters <[email protected]
>>> <mailto:[email protected]>>:
>>>
>>> Hi Gerd,
>>>
>>> so easy - that works!
>>> Thanks for helping me out
>>> Jan
>>>
>>>> Am 16.02.2021 um 17:44 schrieb Gerd Petermann <
>>>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>:
>>>>
>>>> Hi Jan,
>>>>
>>>> is_in(leisure,park,...) & is_in(sport,swimming,...)
>>>> should work.
>>>>
>>>> Gerd
>>>>
>>>> ________________________________________
>>>> Von: mkgmap-dev <[email protected]
>>>> <mailto:[email protected]>> im
>>>> Auftrag von jan meisters <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
>>>> Gesendet: Dienstag, 16. Februar 2021 17:31
>>>> An: Development list for mkgmap
>>>> Betreff: Re: [mkgmap-dev] is_in with own Tags?
>>>>
>>>> Hi Joris,
>>>>
>>>> thanks for stating - I guessed something like that.
>>>>
>>>> What I want is to is_in for a tag-combination, e.g. leisure=park
>>>> & sport=swimming.
>>>> I have a poi-rule for park&swimming first and further want to
>>>> exclude swimmings inside matching polygons.
>>>>
>>>> Do I have another option to define the combination so that it can
>>>> be seen by is_in?
>>>>
>>>> Thanks
>>>> Jan
>>>>
>>>>> Am 16.02.2021 um 14:48 schrieb Joris Bo <[email protected]
>>>>> <mailto:[email protected]>>:
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi Jan
>>>>>
>>>>> As far as i understood this function really checks the polygons
>>>>> around the poi to check if the poi-coordinates are located
>>>>> within the polygon specified.
>>>>> It can not check variables because they don't have an outline.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Met vriendelijke groeten,
>>>>>
>>>>> Joris Bo
>>>>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>>>>>
>>>>> -----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
>>>>> Van: mkgmap-dev <[email protected]
>>>>> <mailto:[email protected]>> Namens
>>>>> jan meisters
>>>>> Verzonden: dinsdag 16 februari 2021 14:12
>>>>> Aan: Development list for mkgmap <
>>>>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
>>>>> Onderwerp: [mkgmap-dev] is_in with own Tags?
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>
>>>>> I try to use is_in to fetch pois inside own invented tags,
>>>>> e.g.:
>>>>>
>>>>> leisure=park {add processed=yes} [0x2c06 resolution 24
>>>>> continue with_actions]
>>>>> leisure=swimming_pool & is_in(processed,yes,in_or_on)=true
>>>>> {delete leisure}
>>>>>
>>>>> This fails, however „is_in(leisure,park,in_or_on)=true“ works
>>>>> in the example.
>>>>> Could someone explain where I´m wrong?
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks
>>>>> Jan
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> mkgmap-dev mailing list
>>>>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>>>>> http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> mkgmap-dev mailing list
>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>> http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> mkgmap-dev mailing list
>>>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>>>> http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
>>>> <http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> mkgmap-dev mailing list
>>>> [email protected]
>>>> http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> mkgmap-dev mailing list
>>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>>> http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
>>> <http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> mkgmap-dev mailing list
>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>> http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
>> <http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev>
> _______________________________________________
> mkgmap-dev mailing list
> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
> http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
> <http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev>
_______________________________________________
mkgmap-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
