Hi all,
I´m using an altered copy of the OFM style and therefore sometimes compare the
results.
One routing difference I found I was able to lead back, but the cause I don´t
understand at all.
My test-route should prefer the small residential „Altengabengäßchen“ over the
primary „Viktoriastrasse“.
Latest OFM does, my version not since I removed {add bicycle=yes} from this
line:
highway=path & surface ~
'(paved|asphalt|sett|concrete|paving_stones|paving_stones:30)' & access!=no &
access!=private & vehicle!=no { set highway=pedestrian; add bicycle=yes; add
motorcar=yes; }
But unfortunately there is no path or pedestrian in the test-route, nor is it
an option to use one.
Anyone has an idea how this path>pedestrian rule could affect routing on
residential/primary?
Same happens when I replay the change with the original OFM.
Up-to-date osm.pbf, route from BC and screenshots are here:
https://files.mkgmap.org.uk/download/556/test_route.zip
Thanks
Jan
_______________________________________________
mkgmap-dev mailing list
mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk
https://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
