quel report è si interessante ma ha qualche problemino :)
Title: Mandiant APT1 Report Has Critical Analytic Flaws Author: Jeffrey Carr Source: Taia Global, Inc Date Published: 19th February 2013 Excerpt: '....If this report were written by a professional intelligence analyst at CIA, it would most likely undergo a vetting process known as ACH (Analysis of Competing Hypotheses): ACH forces the intelligence analyst to look for all alternative hypotheses and assess them one at a time to see which best fits the data collected. This is rarely if ever done by information security companies, and it's the single biggest objection that I have when it comes to individuals making claims of attribution to nation states. Heuer's iconic "Psychology of Intelligence Analysis" explains why ACH is so important: If Mandiant or another organization were to use ACH on this evidence, here's how Heuer recommends it be done. It's an 8-step process:.....' http://jeffreycarr.blogspot.co.uk/2013/02/mandiant-apt1-report-has-critical.html http://www.businessinsider.com/mandiant-china-report-questioned-2013-2 On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 2:08 PM, Gabriele Scolaro <[email protected]> wrote: > Report molto interessante IMO: > http://intelreport.mandiant.com/Mandiant_APT1_Report.pdf > > > > ________________________________________________________ > http://www.sikurezza.org - Italian Security Mailing List > -- -- 愚者不問，問者不愚。
________________________________________________________ http://www.sikurezza.org - Italian Security Mailing List
