In considerazione delle proposizioni governative in merito di voto
online, è utile leggere quanto l'ENISA scrive come raccomandazioni sulla
election security.
E' rilevante che tutto il comparto degli addetti al settore sicurezza
ICT possa informare l'ambito istituzionale e politico, per quanto di
loro competenza, sui rischi relativi per la sicurezza, e di conseguenza
per la democrazia.
Election cybersecurity - Challenges and opportunities
https://www.enisa.europa.eu/publications/enisa-position-papers-and-opinions/election-cybersecurity-challenges-and-opportunities/view
Molto interessate da approfondire, nella sezione 5 entra nel merito del
voto elettronico e voto online, chiaramente identificandoli come rischi
abbandonati da tutti i paesi europei (tranne Belgio ed Estonia) e
sottolineando come il voto online sia enormemente più rischioso del voto
elettronico.
"Given that the majority of Member States have either postponed or
discontinued the use of electronic voting, the risk associated with the
voting process can be considered to be somewhat reduced. Examples
of countries that have postponed or discontinued electronic voting
include Ireland,15 the Netherlands,16 France,17 Finland18 and Germany.19
In the Netherlands in 2017, the government also decided to return to
counting votes by hand instead of the electronic counting due to
cybersecurity concerns.20 Examples of countries that make use of
electronic voting technology include Estonia21 and Belgium22.
Taking into consideration that, as noted above, the roll- out of
electronic voting has been either discontinued or postponed in a number
of Member States, the cybersecurity risk level in relation to the voting
process is considered medium. This cybersecurity risk level is likely to
be higher in countries where e-voting systems are being implemented. A
distinction should also be made between online and offline e-voting
systems, where the former is likely to entail a higher cybersecurity
risk level than the latter. "
Fabio
