On Mon, Sep 8, 2014 at 12:37 AM, Maksym Veremeyenko <ve...@m1stereo.tv> wrote: > 05.09.14 19:28, Dan Dennedy написав(ла): > >> On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 3:51 AM, Maksym Veremeyenko<ve...@m1stereo.tv> >> wrote: >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> this patch provides ability to pass properties to encapsulated producer >>> and >>> consumer. >> >> >> Thank you for the contribution, Maksym. We have a convention to use a >> prefix on the property name to make it pass to encapsulated services. >> See for example, watermark and affine filters. In this case, you would >> use simply mlt_properties_pass() with "prefix." or "consumer.". How do >> you feel to change your patch to work like that? Or, is there are >> reason you prefer it as you have submitted? >> > > i reworked a patch to use prefixes "producer." and "consumer.". > please review
Very smart of you to add a property-changed listener. I applied this and submitted my own yml update. Thanks -- +-DRD-+ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Want excitement? Manually upgrade your production database. When you want reliability, choose Perforce. Perforce version control. Predictably reliable. http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=157508191&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ Mlt-devel mailing list Mlt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mlt-devel
