Oh, my oversight with > and <. I shall try again with negative numbers
in that case and let you know what exactly happens. My apology for the
oversight.



On 10/30/14, Dan Dennedy <d...@dennedy.org> wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 2:09 AM, Zenny <garbytr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Unfortunately using more than 1 core (tried with real_time=4/3/2)
>> output the video with flickers and jitters. could be a bug. :-(
>>
>>
> You did not read that FAQ item very well. >1 may still incur
> frame-dropping. You should be using -2, -3, or -4 for file-based
> processing. On my systems with 8 logical cores, I see little advantage in
> using more than 4 image processing threads.
>
>
>> On 10/30/14, Zenny <garbytr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > Thanks Dan for such a wonderfully-written FAQ.
>> >
>> > real_time=>0 worked like charm.
>> >
>> > However there is no way KDE does multithreaded with real_time=>0
>> > except creating the script and manually change the script.
>>
>> > /zenny
>> >
>> > On 10/29/14, Dan Dennedy <d...@dennedy.org> wrote:
>> >> On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 2:41 AM, Zenny <garbytr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>
>> >>> Hi:
>> >>>
>> >>> Trying to render both melt in command line as well as from kdenlive a
>> >>> composite video with threads=4 with forced progressive. But it seems
>> >>> it only uses only one CPU.
>> >>>
>> >>> Is this a limitation of mlt that multi-threading is not possible with
>> >>> composite video rendering? Thanks!
>> >>>
>> >>
>> >> RTFAQ
>> >> --
>> >> +-DRD-+
>> >>
>> >
>>
>
>
>
> --
> +-DRD-+
>

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Mlt-devel mailing list
Mlt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mlt-devel

Reply via email to