Hi, > Patrick Matthäi <pmatth...@debian.org> wrote: > > Thanks for your explaination. So we know now, that it is not easy > > fixable within the mlt source code. > > > > @Dan: > > Would you merge his patch?
I didn't really intend for my patch to go upstream. It is a rushed fix until GNU libc headers or some other kfreebsd header can provide this. Although, that could take many months or years. Dan Dennedy wrote: > I prefer to merge a different patch I shared previously that excludes GNU > kFreeBSD but should still permit FreeBSD. > [...] > +#if !(defined(__FreeBSD_kernel__) && defined(__GLIBC__)) If you are happy to patch this in upstream code, yes you would need to do exactly that to not break this on 'real' FreeBSD. Thank you, Regards, -- Steven Chamberlain ste...@pyro.eu.org
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Site24x7 APM Insight: Get Deep Visibility into Application Performance APM + Mobile APM + RUM: Monitor 3 App instances at just $35/Month Monitor end-to-end web transactions and take corrective actions now Troubleshoot faster and improve end-user experience. Signup Now! http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=272487151&iu=/4140
_______________________________________________ Mlt-devel mailing list Mlt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mlt-devel
