Hey Dan,
in these weeks I couldn't work on a PC, so I couldnt check this. Do you
think dropping SDL 1.2 from mlt would be a problem? Maybe porting mlt to
use SDL 2 would also be a nice option :)
-------- Weitergeleitete Nachricht --------
Betreff: Bug#1038506: libmlt7: Contains a plugin for an obsolete
version of SDL
Weitersenden-Datum: Sun, 18 Jun 2023 16:45:01 +0000
Weitersenden-Von: Simon McVittie <s...@debian.org>
Weitersenden-An: debian-bugs-d...@lists.debian.org
Weitersenden-CC: Patrick Matthäi <pmatth...@debian.org>
Datum: Sun, 18 Jun 2023 17:42:50 +0100
Von: Simon McVittie <s...@debian.org>
Antwort an: Simon McVittie <s...@debian.org>, 1038...@bugs.debian.org
An: sub...@bugs.debian.org
Package: libmlt7
Version: 7.14.0-1
Tags: trixie sid
User: pkg-sdl-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: libsdl1.2
libmlt7 appears to contain plugins for both SDL 1.2 and SDL 2, and as a
result, it depends on both libsdl1.2debian and libsdl2-2.0-0.
SDL 1.2 is unmaintained upstream and we should be trying to move away
from it.
Various Debian packages depend on mlt:
- flowblade
- kdenlive
- shotcut
- synfig
- synfigstudio
but as far as I can see, none of them need SDL 1.2 specifically. Would
it be possible to disable/remove the SDL 1.2 plugin in mlt?
Thanks,
smcv
--
This bug report is part of a mass-bug-filing:
<https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2023/06/msg00120.html>
_______________________________________________
Mlt-devel mailing list
Mlt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mlt-devel
