Graham,

In practice there are two main differences between various Linux distros:

1) Package manager - every distribution has its own way of handling
'packages'. Red Hat has RPM, Debian has apt-get, Fedora has the YUM, and so
on and so forth.

and

2) Preconfigured Kernel / Bundled Application - Ubuntu's kernel and bundled
applications geared more to the home user, whereas RedHat is geared more
towards enterprises, etc..

Mind you, one can make any distro bundled with any application he likes, and
one can tune his kernel to whatever he wants. So basically when I,
personally, asked your question several years ago, I took into consideration
which package manager was most flexible to me, AND which was popular at that
time. I am a Debian lover, and have been using it for the past 5 years.

As regards to the wireless, PCMCIA, etc stuff you mentioned, you need to
read more about Kernel configuration. IF you switch to a distro which will
have wireless configured in its kernel and solves your problem, rest assured
that in the future you'll stumble across another problem which will not be
dealt by the stock kernel. So just read and learn, and if you have
difficulties, just ask here in the list.


On 1/23/07, Graham Petley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Hallo,

  This may seem a stupid question, but what difference is there between
the
different Linux distributions? I currently run Suse 10.1 and KDE on my
laptop,
and have DVD's for Suse 10.2 and Ubuntu Edgy Eft. Is it worth updating or
switching disti?

  I'm not that happy with Suse because the PCMCIA slot doesn't work (it
does
in XP); wireless doesn't work (in XP it does) and I think my kernel is
tainted
with something called Linuxant; in battery mode the screen is dimmed and I
can't control this; when I upgraded to 10.1 my file system was changed
from
Ext3 to reiserfs without asking me (although now I think reiserfs is
better);
the upgrade also deleted software I use like kedit, which I had to
reinstall
from source and it isn't as stable as it was.

  I don't think Suse or Ubuntu will make any difference in getting these
things to work. I also don't think they'll make any diference in offering
me
the new features I really want like the ability to read and write an NTFS
disk
partition; to use the Windos key-E combo to open a new console window; the
ability to play DVD's easily; a photo viewing program as easy to use and
print
from as Windows Picture and Fax Viewer. The only thing I'm really certain
I
will see is a new KDE interface which could mean all my menu
customisations
will be trashed.

  Then I've got Crossover Office. Will that still work?

  Are there any opinions on what real and useful differences I would see
with
either of these new distis?

Saluti, Graham Petley
_______________________________________________
MLUG-list mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailserv.megabyte.net/mailman/listinfo/mlug-list




--
http://www.jamesattard.com
_______________________________________________
MLUG-list mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailserv.megabyte.net/mailman/listinfo/mlug-list

Reply via email to