The article below indicates that the situation with the patentability of
obvious software patents in the US might be changing. This could be why M$
prefers making threats rather than using the courts and risk losing.

http://www.embedded.com/shared/printableArticle.jhtml?articleID=199203516

Didn't someone here point out some time ago that M$ had a patent on the mouse
double click? If so, it's probably one of the 235 alleged infringements.
And if I remember rightly, Apple took M$ to court for infringement over patents
related to the graphics user interface, where M$ pretty much ripped Apple off
with W95. And Apple lost.
The M$ threats are probably FUD to persuade large corporations like Dell and
Samsung to cross-licence the M$ patents.
-Graham Petley

> Date: Mon, 14 May 2007 18:37:05 +0200
> From: Keith Vassallo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: [LINUX.ORG.MT] Microsoft demands royalties for open-source
>       software
> To: [email protected]
> 
>
http://www.computerworld.com/action/article.do?command=viewArticleBasic&taxonomyName=development&articleId=9019238&taxonomyId=11&intsrc=kc_top
> 
> Keith
> 
> Date: Mon, 14 May 2007 19:03:01 +0200
> From: Philip Serracino Inglott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: [LINUX.ORG.MT] Microsoft demands royalties for
>       open-source     software
> To: Malta Linux User Group - general list <[email protected]>
> 
> You must admire the people though. They strategically plan their 
> assault, covering themselves, just like a chess player, and then attack 
> on many fronts simultaneously. These guys should be in the military.
> 
> There is one thing that one needs to keep in mind. That to win a war, 
> you also need to have the right cause. Call me a fool if you will, but I 
> think Microsoft's strategic delay, to be able to strike a deadly blow, 
> might, if taken to far, serve us all too well. It might actually do more 
> harm to the patent system then to Linux.
> 
> I am eagerly waiting to see each of these patents analysed objectively 
> ... I wonder if they include a patent for catastrophic system 
> malfunction (aka Kernel Panic) :-P
> 
> Philip
> 
> Keith Vassallo wrote:
> >
>
http://www.computerworld.com/action/article.do?command=viewArticleBasic&taxonomyName=development&articleId=9019238&taxonomyId=11&intsrc=kc_top
> >
> > Keith
_______________________________________________
MLUG-list mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailserv.megabyte.net/mailman/listinfo/mlug-list

Reply via email to