Reject. Comments? This is what the New Zealand Open Source Society think about it (published this week): http://holloway.co.nz/can-other-vendors-implement-ooxml.html
Regards, On Sun, 19 Aug 2007 11:07:59 +0200 "Anton Xuereb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > reject!!! > > > LONG LIVE THE QUEEN!!!!!!! err.. I mean OSS!1 > > On 8/19/07, Ramon Casha <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > MSA sent an email that the TC meeting about OOXML has been > > postponed: > > > > "Dear TC member > > > > Due to urgent work, the meeting scheduled for next Monday 20th > > August is being postponed by a week to Monday 27th August at the > > same time and venue. > > > > Whilst apologizing for this postponement, please be guided > > accordingly." So it's very likely that this will be the meeting at > > which the vote will be taken: approve, reject with comments, or > > abstain. > > > > -- > > Ramon Casha > > _______________________________________________ > > MLUG-list mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://mailserv.megabyte.net/mailman/listinfo/mlug-list > > > > -- Mario Xerri [holo]
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ MLUG-list mailing list [email protected] http://mailserv.megabyte.net/mailman/listinfo/mlug-list
