This sounds promising: http://www.consortiuminfo.org/standardsblog/article.php?story=2007090315253367
Keith On Tue, 4 Sep 2007 03:27:46 -0500, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > UPDATE: According to this information, the vote for OOXML has failed. It > did not reach the 2/3rds majority required by the P-Members of JTC1, as 13 > members have been reported, voting "no" and 5 members are abstaining, with > a total of 41 members. To get the 2/3rds majority, 19 members would have > to > vote "yes" on top of the 7 members that did already. However, only 16 > members are remaining without a vote. > > > On Tue, 4 Sep 2007 10:12:07 +0200, "Anton Xuereb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: >> > http://balanceofcowards.blogspot.com/2007/08/tracking-status-of-office-open-xml.html >> >> >> x'misthija - Malta ( JTC1 & SC34 ): yes >> >> On 9/4/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> >>> >>> http://slashdot.org/articles/07/09/03/1934203.shtml >>> >>> Interesting read! Especially the comments... >>> >>> Keith >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> MLUG-list mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> http://mailserv.megabyte.net/mailman/listinfo/mlug-list >>> > > _______________________________________________ > MLUG-list mailing list > [email protected] > http://mailserv.megabyte.net/mailman/listinfo/mlug-list _______________________________________________ MLUG-list mailing list [email protected] http://mailserv.megabyte.net/mailman/listinfo/mlug-list
