I did notice it, because you mentioned Damn Small Linux, which is hardly
a mainstream distro, but it's top 10 on distrowatch.

I agree bout the isos. Especially for opensuse, maybe debian/fedora etc?


On Wed, 2008-05-21 at 21:50 +0200, Raphael Borg Ellul Vincenti wrote:
> Just in case nobody realized, the distros I picked to put in the poll
> are indeed the top distros on distrowatch!
> 
> Also, we used to previously mirror OpenOffice.org Firefox and Knoppix
> for the convenience of users. The point of asking who uses which
> distro was simply to figure out who uses what and avoid mirroring
> whole distributions which according to distrowatch are popular but
> which never hit the mediterranean sea. I indeed used most if not
> almost all the distros mentioned in that list. However, I would be
> happy to get timely ISOs during release days and updates for every day
> use of only one at this moment in time.
> 
> Also, 1.5TB is not limiting. We just have to make sure we are not
> mirroring old stuff or architectures that nobody is using. For
> example... does anybody (in Malta) run Linux on SPARC or PPC ? Now
> that is an interesting question.
> 
> Just my 2c.
> 
> On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 9:30 PM, Sebastian Cachia
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Yeah, I'm at Uni (2nd year IT). What stream are you in Jean? You have quite
> > a high count. I put it at about 3 in my year who use it by choice (including
> > myself). A few others have used it for course requirements but that's about
> > it.
> >
> > 10 distros would be a bit too much, but certainly would be great if disk
> > space wasn't an issue. Probably best to stick to just the real popular ones.
> > Though I'm quite sure everybody would like to have their distro mirrored so
> > that they could save on the download limit, but it isn't really feasible for
> > just a handful of people who would make use of it.
> >
> > Perhaps a good idea would be to have a mirror of just the ISO images of the
> > top 10 distros instead of the entire repository. Would certainly be a lot
> > less disk space, and would still be good for saving the download limit of
> > anyone interested.
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > MLUG-list mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > http://linux.org.mt/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mlug-list
> >
> >
> _______________________________________________
> MLUG-list mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://linux.org.mt/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mlug-list

_______________________________________________
MLUG-list mailing list
[email protected]
http://linux.org.mt/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mlug-list

Reply via email to