This has to be pushed from above. ISPs will never upgrade all their routers out of will unless it makes financial sense to them. Only new ISPs who buy new equipment would actually offer support. The following people might have a better clue: http://www.mt.ipv6tf.org/aboutus/
Last I asked I published my findings over here. I honestly don't consider it worth it to use tunnelling services since it reminds me of the good old days of dialup (including the latency). On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 11:17 AM, Anton Xuereb <mewt.rea...@gmail.com>wrote: > ah fudgits...it's the same method of management we always work with here in > malta..Instead of being aware of the global problem with ipv4 addresses and > taking steps to be the first in teh market to implement ipv6 and bring new > functionality to the client, we wait and lurk in the shadows until the > problem becomes so real that not facing it would result in people not having > internet connectivity. > > Ofcourse this will bring with it the usual problems of a hurried migration, > no proper plan, missing features and lacking services of which in the end > it's us as customers that will be facing the consequences. > > And when then finally they do start moving to ipv6, none of their > subscribers will have ipv6 enabled routers that actually support the stack > well resulting in even more inconvenience. > > Early dual stack adoption would help avoid all this but hey im not more > than a snotty customer that doesn't know anything 'bout natworkssss hijj! > > ax hekk qalli tal go lahhar darba li cempilt :| > > > On 23 February 2010 11:08, Iain <i...@maltagc.com> wrote: > >> I wonder if Glen considers a year to be "the near future"? >> >> I'm seriously questioning whether any ISP has actually done something to >> implement IPv6 locally. An email I received from GO towards the end of >> last year said that they "do not have any time frame when the system >> will be upgraded to IPv6" and that "all the network's infastructure >> [sic] needs to be changed". >> >> Hoping for some positive results from another angle, but for the time >> being, using a tunnel broker seems to be the only solution. >> >> Smart Island, my arse. >> >> On 08/03/09 23:04, Anton Xuereb wrote: >> > Dear client, >> > >> > regarding IPv6 deployment, the company is in process to implement >> > IPv6 in the future but due to the complexity of the isue we are unable >> > to provide you with an exact date then this will be finalised. We will >> > however, in the near future, advise our clients when IPv6 is to be >> > deployed and the steps to be taken to implement it from there end. >> > Should you need further information please do not hesitate to contact us >> > back. >> > >> > Thanks and best regards, >> > >> > Glen Taylor >> > >> > GO Technical Support Agent. >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > On Sun, Mar 8, 2009 at 2:44 PM, Raphael Borg Ellul Vincenti >> > <raph...@neo-tix.com >> > <mailto:raph...@neo-tix.com>> wrote: >> > >> > Bil-Malti nghidu laqi - but yes lets hear what they have to say. >> > Vodafone anyone ? >> > >> > On Sun, Mar 8, 2009 at 2:09 PM, Anton Xuereb >> > <mewt.rea...@gmail.com >> > <mailto:mewt.rea...@gmail.com>> wrote: >> > > I finally got round to emailing some isps.. >> > > >> > > >> > > GO >> > > ______________________________________________________________ >> > > Hi, >> > > >> > > I would like to enquire on the state of IPv6 deployment or any >> > plans to do >> > > so. >> > > >> > > As per EU directives, 25% of european households should be IPv6 >> > enabled by >> > > 2010 and there is no better way for GO to retain it's dominant >> > position in >> > > the Maltese market than by being at the front of the next >> generation of >> > > internet services. >> > > >> > > Hope to hear from you soon. >> > > >> > > Thanks, >> > > >> > > Anton Xuereb >> > > >> > > ______________________________________________________________ >> > > >> > > Melita >> > > >> > > ______________________________________________________________ >> > > >> > > Message : >> > > >> > > HI, >> > > >> > > I would like to enquire on that state of IPv6 support for melita >> > customers. >> > > As per EU directives 25% of european households should be IPv6 >> > enabled by >> > > 2010. Being at the front of the IPv6 revolution in Malta would >> > ensure that >> > > Melita remains the main telecommunications provider in Malta. >> > > >> > > Thanks, >> > > >> > > >> > > Anton Xuereb >> > > >> > > P.S. Yes I know, I'm a lying bastard - sue me Nothing like >> > telling them >> > > what they wanna hear :D >> > > >> > > M >> > > On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 10:59 PM, Keith Vassallo >> > <kei...@me.com >> > <mailto:kei...@me.com>> wrote: >> > >> >> > >> To me that sounds like they are not doing anything, otherwise >> they >> > >> would say so. >> > >> >> > >> K >> > >> >> > >> On Mar 2, 2009, at 14:10, Raphael Borg Ellul Vincenti >> > <raph...@neo-tix.com >> > <mailto:raph...@neo-tix.com> >> > >> > wrote: >> > >> >> > >> > I forgot to mention, but it would be best to liase with the >> people >> > >> > representing the ISPs on the IPv6 task force. >> > >> > >> > >> > On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 1:53 PM, Iain >> > <i...@maltagc.com >> > <mailto:i...@maltagc.com>> wrote: >> > >> >> Last week I sent messages to GO, Vodafone, Melita and Austin >> Gatt >> > >> >> asking >> > >> >> about the status of IPv6 support. >> > >> >> >> > >> >> So far I have one reply from GO: >> > >> >> >> > >> >> "Unfortunately we are not in a position to respond to the >> question >> > >> >> below. It is currently an internal information which at the >> > moment we >> > >> >> cannot give out, but will be informing our customers in the >> > upcoming >> > >> >> future." >> > >> >> >> > >> >> Great. Will not even say *if* they're doing anything about it! >> > >> >> >> > >> >> Iain. >> > >> >> >> > >> >> Nothing back from any of the others. >> > >> >> >> > >> >> On 25/02/09 10:08, Raphael Borg Ellul Vincenti wrote: >> > >> >>> None... I have already sent an email to all of them as well >> as >> > >> >>> nudging >> > >> >>> them to provide PoP access via SIXXS since they would >> probably >> > >> >>> need to >> > >> >>> change their ADSL/cable modems. I suggest you send another >> gentle >> > >> >>> email. The more people ask, the more they consider buying the >> > >> >>> bandwidth. The only entity which apparently has official >> > native IPv6 >> > >> >>> connectivity is University through the EU academic network. >> > >> >>> >> > >> >>> If anyone on the list can shed more light about this issue, I >> > >> >>> would be >> > >> >>> deeply thankful. >> > >> >>> >> > >> >>> I have setup my home router (Linux of course) with IPv6 >> > connectivity >> > >> >>> through a tunnel to holland. The italian PoP which was the >> closest >> > >> >>> wasn't providing access to non-customers when I registered. I >> was >> > >> >>> given a /48 and all my home has native IPv6 connectivity. >> Would be >> > >> >>> great to eliminate the need to tunnel since it kills latency >> > when I >> > >> >>> connect remotely to a file share or download ISOs via >> bittorrent. >> > >> >>> SIXXS offer a very good bittorrent service for people >> connected >> > >> >>> natively via IPv6. >> > >> >>> >> > >> >>> On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 10:01 AM, Iain >> > <i...@maltagc.com >> > <mailto:i...@maltagc.com>> wrote: >> > >> >>>> Anyone know of an ISP in Malta who supports IPv6? >> > >> >>>> >> > >> >>>> Regs. >> > >> >>>> >> > >> >>>> Iain. >> > >> >>>> >> > >> >>>> _______________________________________________ >> > >> >>>> MLUG-list mailing list >> > >> >>>> MLUG-list@linux.org.mt >> > <mailto:MLUG-list@linux.org.mt> >> > >> >>>> http://linux.org.mt/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mlug-list >> > >> >>>> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> _______________________________________________ >> > >> >> MLUG-list mailing list >> > >> >> MLUG-list@linux.org.mt >> > <mailto:MLUG-list@linux.org.mt> >> > >> >> http://linux.org.mt/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mlug-list >> > >> >> >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > >> > MLUG-list mailing list >> > >> > MLUG-list@linux.org.mt >> > <mailto:MLUG-list@linux.org.mt> >> > >> > http://linux.org.mt/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mlug-list >> > >> _______________________________________________ >> > >> MLUG-list mailing list >> > >> MLUG-list@linux.org.mt >> > <mailto:MLUG-list@linux.org.mt> >> > >> http://linux.org.mt/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mlug-list >> > > >> > > >> > > _______________________________________________ >> > > MLUG-list mailing list >> > > MLUG-list@linux.org.mt >> > <mailto:MLUG-list@linux.org.mt> >> > > http://linux.org.mt/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mlug-list >> > > >> > > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > MLUG-list mailing list >> > MLUG-list@linux.org.mt >> > <mailto:MLUG-list@linux.org.mt> >> > http://linux.org.mt/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mlug-list >> > >> > >> > >> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > MLUG-list mailing list >> > MLUG-list@linux.org.mt >> > http://linux.org.mt/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mlug-list >> >> _______________________________________________ >> MLUG-list mailing list >> MLUG-list@linux.org.mt >> http://linux.org.mt/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mlug-list >> > > > _______________________________________________ > MLUG-list mailing list > MLUG-list@linux.org.mt > http://linux.org.mt/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mlug-list > >
_______________________________________________ MLUG-list mailing list MLUG-list@linux.org.mt http://linux.org.mt/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mlug-list
