I agree that change for the sake of change should be discouraged unless
it is deemed to be absolutely beneficial in the long term.

I've been trying out the new themes(with window buttons on the left) on
9.10 for the past month or so and I must admit that I am still not used
to this new configuration. I'm not sure it's such a good idea. on the
other hand I think that they are trying to attract Mac users, maybe?

Finally I would never perform an upgrade before exams!!! I've got my
simulator next week and I absolutely require my notebook OS to be fully
functional. I'll be performing a full clean upgrade of all my computers
some time in the second week of May. This should give the Ubuntu teams
time to weed out any initial bugs.

Good Luck for your exams Anton.

Alan.

On Fri, 2010-04-30 at 10:01 +0200, Anton Xuereb wrote:

> I'm always of the opinion that change for the sake of changing should
> be discouraged. In their mission to differentiate themselves from
> conventional systems, i think that the ubuntu team have made some
> unwise decision. 
> 
> 
> Coupled with the fact that the upgrade process deleted my bluetooth
> stack for no apparent reason along with evolution. Also, usplash seems
> to be missing as it's not detected by startupmanager and i get half a
> corrupted splash screen on shutdown, black screen on boot with
> horrible resolution. 
> 
> 
> I'm pining for arch atm, unfortunately I have an exam in exactly 1
> week 1 day so i have no time to do a stage 1 install :(
> 
> 
> On 30 April 2010 08:26, Alan Muscat <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
>         LOL .... is it that bad???
>         
>         Alan.
>         
>         
>         
>         On Fri, 2010-04-30 at 02:13 +0200, Anton Xuereb wrote:
>         
>         > ok 10.04 first impressions..
>         > 
>         > 
>         > i want my 9.10 back!
>         > 
>         > 
>         > now!
>         > 
>         > On 30 April 2010 00:04, Anton Xuereb <[email protected]>
>         > wrote:
>         > 
>         >         upgrade process changes them again...changing them
>         >         manually worked 
>         >         
>         >         
>         >         
>         >         On 29 April 2010 23:26, Rodrick Borg
>         >         <[email protected]> wrote:
>         >         
>         >                 I dunno if I understood you problem exactly
>         >                 but to change the download server:
>         >                 
>         >                 go to Systems -> Administration _> Software
>         >                 Sources
>         >                 
>         >                 Then change download from to a new mirror...
>         >                 (You can click Other -> Select Best Server)
>         >                 
>         >                 
>         >                 On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 10:03 PM, Anton
>         >                 Xuereb <[email protected]> wrote:
>         >                 
>         >                 
>         >                         
>         >                         Hey guys,  
>         >                         
>         >                         
>         >                         Im trying to do a dist-upgrade to
>         >                         teh latest ubuntu version,
>         >                         unfortunately the automatic updater
>         >                         (update-manager) changes the
>         >                         sources.list file to point to the
>         >                         central ubuntu mirror which as you
>         >                         can guess atm, is slower than
>         >                         watching paint dry.  
>         >                         
>         >                         
>         >                         Is there some way of forcing it to
>         >                         use a different mirror for the
>         >                         upgrade ? I'd like to be ready at
>         >                         2am tops. 
>         >                         
>         >                         
>         >                         M 
>         >                         
>         >                         
>         >                         
> _______________________________________________
>         >                         MLUG-list mailing list
>         >                         [email protected]
>         >                         
> http://linux.org.mt/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mlug-list
>         >                         
>         >                 
>         >                 
>         >                 
>         >                 _______________________________________________
>         >                 MLUG-list mailing list
>         >                 [email protected]
>         >                 
> http://linux.org.mt/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mlug-list
>         >                 
>         >         
>         >         
>         >         
>         > 
>         > 
>         > 
>         > 
>         > _______________________________________________
>         > MLUG-list mailing list
>         > [email protected]
>         > http://linux.org.mt/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mlug-list
>         
>         
>         _______________________________________________
>         MLUG-list mailing list
>         [email protected]
>         http://linux.org.mt/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mlug-list
>         
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> MLUG-list mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://linux.org.mt/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mlug-list

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

_______________________________________________
MLUG-list mailing list
[email protected]
http://linux.org.mt/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mlug-list

Reply via email to