I used Zabbix for a number of small-ish (less then 200 workstations) and found it extremely powerful and robust, once I had everything configured properly (like every other OSS project :] )
~k On Wed, 2010-06-23 at 11:16 -0400, Hroðgar Skjöldung wrote: > Hej, > My personal preference would be for ganglia rather than munun. I have run > large clusters with nagios and ganglia. I am pretty happy with both. > > Ganglia's advantage is, its not dependent on a single server to store the > data, this is helpful if one half the network backs out, you dot loose that > data... lots here to say but I will keep it short. > > *Ganglia is used in most HPC centres that I know of. > > held og lykke, > Hro > > > > > On Jun 23, 2010, at 10:29 AM, David Montminy wrote: > > > Hi all! > > > > I've got a new job and a need to setup monitoring for the small > > infrastructure we have. It need to include snmp graphs because we want > > to monitor traffic in the different switches. I did 1 or 2 installation > > of Nagios+Cacti, but of I wondering about other solutions like Zenoss, > > Munin or Zabbix. Does anyone has experience with these solutions? Do > > they work well? > > > > I know the question has been asked before (in 2007 and 2008... I'm > > looking through the archives now). Have things changed since? > > > > David Montminy > > _______________________________________________ > > mlug mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://listes.koumbit.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mlug-listserv.mlug.ca > > _______________________________________________ > mlug mailing list > [email protected] > https://listes.koumbit.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mlug-listserv.mlug.ca
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ mlug mailing list [email protected] https://listes.koumbit.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mlug-listserv.mlug.ca
