--- On Fri, 4/8/11, Jared Brick <[email protected]> wrote:

From: Jared Brick <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [MLUG] Cloud Computing
To: "Montreal Linux Users Group" <[email protected]>
Date: Friday, April 8, 2011, 11:40 AM

I see a definite shift in the way companies are/will do business.
Should companies put their data in other companies hands? Well they already do! 
They use Windows/Redhat/Oracle, they outsource half their staff, they give the 
email addresses of all their customers to epsilon, etc. Offloading server 
maintenance, system reliability, redundancy and performance tuning seems like a 
pretty logical step. And I don't think this is simply on-demand computing, 
think Google apps for your domain or salesforce.com. There are plenty of web 
based, outsourced apps in every vertical.

Most publicly traded companies have to focus on their core competencies, and 
keep operational costs low. For smaller companies the barrier of entry is much 
lower.
Yes there needs to be sys admin to maintain those servers "in the cloud", but 
the ratio is way off. Not 5 to 1, more like 1000 to 1. Yes there needs to be a 
"tech guy" in the company to ensure this is in place, but he doesn't have to be 
as knowledgeable, and can easily be outsourced. A large service company like 
IBM can come in and do what integration and management is left.

Does it cost more? No way I would accept such a premise. How often do you over 
spec a server for the once a quarter peak loads? How good is your uptime? How 
quickly can you replace parts? How quickly can you move entire datacenters? Why 
bother maintaining a mail server? Why bother maintaining a CRM system? How many 
people are you paying to do this work that has nothing to do with your core 
business?

I'm not saying that SA work is going to disappear, but in 10-15 years I'm sure 
demand will be far lower than the supply.
*Full disclosure: I work for a prominent "cloud" company. But I assure you my 
opinions are my own! 


On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 1:40 PM, Patricia Campbell <[email protected]> 
wrote:

I don't necessarily agree.  It can be cost effective if you need it on a 
regular basis.  With the prices the way they are you pay for what you need when 
you need it depending on the use / security etc it may be the most cost 
effective.  In the case I sited it would be, it would also be more flexible. 



Unless, like NRC you are using your facilities to capacity, then it is 
worthwhile to create a private cloud. 
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 12:23 AM, spam spammer <[email protected]> 
wrote:





On 7 April 2011 00:10, Nick Sklav <[email protected]> wrote:






Here is a nice read similar to what Patricia was mentioning, This

company got the aprox 10,000 cores running in an amazon cloud for 8

hours at the cost of aprox 9000$. And finished his project in that time

frame so I guess the cloud is more than just a storage server ;)



http://www.networkworld.com/news/2011/040611-linux-supercomputer.html


Quite true, when you need that computing power once in a blue moon. But  not if 
you need it regularly! Which I think was the initial point.



_______________________________________________

mlug mailing list

[email protected]

https://listes.koumbit.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mlug-listserv.mlug.ca





-- 
___..___........__.......__
...|....|__/....|...|......|...|__|
...|....|.....\...|...|__..|...|....|

"You must be the change you wish to see in the world." Mohandas K Gandhi






_______________________________________________

mlug mailing list

[email protected]

https://listes.koumbit.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mlug-listserv.mlug.ca





-----Inline Attachment Follows-----

_______________________________________________
mlug mailing list
[email protected]
https://listes.koumbit.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mlug-listserv.mlug.ca


Leslie sadly says

>From the way the automobile industry has transitioned, I see the parallel in 
>the transition to cloud computing.

Today cars are very reliable, and most of them are dealer maintained, in lieu 
of the corner garage that has disappeared or is in the process of doing so.

Sadly, the in-house data centre for small and medium businesses is going to go 
the similar way -- to the cloud.

The cloud will provide the business with an ERP system that will include the 
activities from sales-quote to Accounts receivable, and CRM.  What the business 
will maintain are it's data links to the cloud, and even there, it is possible 
that many applications will be tablet based.  Salesmen will not have to come to 
the office, except to collect new samples and for regular meetings.

So, the in-house server park may become a lonely in-house server pair (one 
machine to back up the other)..   It is time for Sysadmins to learn process 
control and other technological IT based functions for a new career.






------------------

Regards  
 Leslie
 Mr. Leslie Satenstein
40 years in IT and going strong.
Yesterday was a good day, today is a better day,
and tomorrow will be even better.
 
mailto:[email protected]
alternative: [email protected] 
www.itbms.biz  
_______________________________________________
mlug mailing list
[email protected]
https://listes.koumbit.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mlug-listserv.mlug.ca

Reply via email to