I agree with Nick, I am a long time user of CentOS for production boxes for SMB and education and v 6 is finally out. However they were very slow to release version 6 which makes me wonder about the stability of the project. So maybe Sci Linux has a better long term outlook due to the fermilab and cern backing, they released v 6 very soon after Redhat did so. It is worth keeping both in mind. Fedora is not a good choice for production boxes.
On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 11:53 PM, Alex Gal <[email protected]> wrote: > Have you given Arch a thought ? > > > On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 9:59 PM, Nick Sklav <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Thu, 2011-08-04 at 18:31 -0700, Leslie S Satenstein wrote: >>> My Fedora 14 distribution has reached end-of-line. Its time to >>> upgrade, and on one drive I already have Fedora 15. >>> >>> >> >> I Would be looking at Centos 6 in your case. You are Familiar with RPM >> your distro of choice seems to always fall back to fedora and thus i can >> honestly recommend Centos 6 or Even Scientific Linux 6. But since one >> has a more robust community Centos in this case I would go with that >> version. It is based on Fedora 13 and has long term support so no end of >> life after 1 year. >> >> Later, >> >> Nick Sklav >> >> _______________________________________________ >> mlug mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://listes.koumbit.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mlug-listserv.mlug.ca >> > _______________________________________________ > mlug mailing list > [email protected] > https://listes.koumbit.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mlug-listserv.mlug.ca > -- ___..___........__.......__ ...|....|__/....|...|......|...|__| ...|....|.....\...|...|__..|...|....| "You must be the change you wish to see in the world." Mohandas K Gandhi _______________________________________________ mlug mailing list [email protected] https://listes.koumbit.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mlug-listserv.mlug.ca
