John Rose a écrit : > Thanks for the fixes, Rémi! I can integrate them into the next respin > of the patch. More will come, i've generified AnonymousClassLoader, found an infinite loop in checkHostClass(), etc. > > (I note with satisfaction that you have signed the OpenJDK contributor > agreement. > http://www.sun.com/software/opensource/contributor_agreement.jsp ) yes, i was even a JDK contributor before it goes opensource.
> > Getting up a repo. for the patches is an item on my (long) to-do list. > I'm going to be using an HG sub-repository for the patches themselves, > which (I hope) will simplify the task of developing multiple changes on > a moving target (the OpenJDK itself). A sub-repository of the OpenJDK hotspot one will be cool. I currently use a kijaro.dev.java.net branch (a SVN repository) but it mixes my patches against Da Vinci VM and the properties runtime library that use it. > > Would you like to be a test subject for the new repo. (when it exists) > and check in the changes yourself? yes. after posting a patch to mlvm-dev and if the patch is reviewed (or at least nobody is against it) i can check in it myself. Futhermore, i will be happy to review patches of other members of this list and check in them too if the volume is low. > > Best, > -- John Rémi > > On Mar 22, 2008, at 12:12 PM, Rémi Forax wrote: > >> Hi john, hi all, >> >> When i tried to compile the VM patched on my laptop (fedora core 6), >> the compiler find two problems: _______________________________________________ mlvm-dev mailing list [email protected] http://mail.openjdk.java.net/mailman/listinfo/mlvm-dev
