Hi John! I was looking at your method handle changeset and I was wondering if in the long run method handles will be serializable? Thinking about (serializable) continuations it would be very convenient if method handles would behave like java.lang.Class (which are serializable). Currently if you want to store a continuation you have to work around the fact that reflect.Method isn't serializable...
- Lukas John Rose wrote: > Last Saturday around midnight the first method handle invocation went > through. It was a virtual call, equivalent to: > Object x = "foo"; > foo.toString(); > > See MethodHandleBytecodeTest.testToString in the push I just did: > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/mlvm/mlvm/hotspot/ > > Next up, adapter method handles. > > -- John > _______________________________________________ > mlvm-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://mail.openjdk.java.net/mailman/listinfo/mlvm-dev > _______________________________________________ mlvm-dev mailing list [email protected] http://mail.openjdk.java.net/mailman/listinfo/mlvm-dev
