Hi, Ulf. I whitelisted you on the mailing list, since you are not
yet a member and it was blocking you.
You probably want to join, in order to receive any responses from the
group.
JSR 292 is discussing bytecode modifications. Array init. is outside
the scope of JSR 292, so I don't know if we can do anything there in
the current round of changes.
But, at least, someone should prototype a mechanism as a subproject
of mlvm. That's what mlvm is for: It is an incubator for new JVM
ideas.
-- John
On Sep 4, 2008, at 4:14 AM, Ulf Zibis wrote:
Hi all,
I had just opened a thread, about class file footprint, and the
result was, that there is some need, to enhance it's format for
array initialization using the constant pool:
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/hotspot-dev/2008-September/
000600.html
>From Patrick Wright I got the hint, to send you a copy of this
discussion, because you would be "pretty open to hearing requests/
ideas for enhancements to the JVM
itself". ;-)
... so here I am. 8-)
Regards,
Ulf
-------- Original-Nachricht --------
Betreff: Re: Enhance footprint for array initialization
Datum: Thu, 4 Sep 2008 12:31:28 +0200
Von: Patrick Wright <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
An: Ulf Zibis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Referenzen: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <5B949BAF-FE81-4EC7-A772-
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Hi Ulf
You might try re-posting on the DaVinci Machine mailing list. They are
pretty open to hearing requests/ideas for enhancements to the JVM
itself.
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/mailman/listinfo/mlvm-dev
Currently they are focused on dynamic language support (the
invoke-dynamic bytecode), but at the very least you'll probably get a
detailed response from a senior HotSpot engineer about the
possibilities.
Good luck!
Patrick
On Thu, Sep 4, 2008 at 12:17 PM, Ulf Zibis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Martin, you bring it to the point in the end. Short and clear.
> About starting an JSR... I wonder that not somebody else had
tried this
> in the past.
> For me, I'm afraid, that I don't have the power for it. Thanks for
> warning me.
>
> Am 04.09.2008 04:12, Martin Buchholz schrieb:
>>
>> And discuss your efforts in this direction in core-libs-dev.
>>
>>
>
> Yes. from this point on it belongs to core-libs-dev.
>
> Ulf
>
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
mlvm-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/mailman/listinfo/mlvm-dev
_______________________________________________
mlvm-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/mailman/listinfo/mlvm-dev
