[EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit : > Changeset: cc20bdee5864 > Author: jrose > Date: 2008-10-08 22:38 -0700 > URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/mlvm/mlvm/langtools/rev/cc20bdee5864 > > meth: support transitional and native forms of invokedynamic in javac and > javap > > ! meth.patch > ! meth.txt > > _______________________________________________ > mlvm-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://mail.openjdk.java.net/mailman/listinfo/mlvm-dev > hum, it seems invokedynamic as now three encodings ? - invokedynamic (bytecode 186) which works like invokestatic - invokeinterface (like in JSR292 current spec) - invokestatic(on java/lang/Dynamic) i suppose.
As the backport implementer, I don't understand why we need two way invokeinterface/invokestatic to emulate invokedynamic ? cheers, Rémi _______________________________________________ mlvm-dev mailing list [email protected] http://mail.openjdk.java.net/mailman/listinfo/mlvm-dev
