The langtools stuff is not yet refreshed against the current build. Thanks for the diffs.
By the way, the indy patch is not refreshed either. The next update will change the instruction format to move away from the representation which uses invokeinterface and toward a receiverless encoding that uses the unused invoke code point. The CP entry will be a NameAndType, not either kind of MethodRef. Like invokeinterface, it will be a five-byte format; the last two bytes will be zero padding (available for interpreter use). When I refresh the indy patch I'll also refresh the langtools patch to emit the required invokedynamic format. I expect that the format for explicit method handle invocation (invokevirtual of invoke (...)..., for any signature) will not change. -- John On Dec 26, 2008, at 1:59 PM, Ben Evans wrote: > Yeah, I figured those out independently - and I think I've got > those patches to apply against the current bsd port with some > manual hackery. > > I'm testing it now to check it took OK and will let the list know > how I get on. _______________________________________________ mlvm-dev mailing list [email protected] http://mail.openjdk.java.net/mailman/listinfo/mlvm-dev
