Hello Jürgen, Thanks for patches :) It's compiled successfully now.
Best regards, Chanwit On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 12:47 PM, scheme mlvm <scheme.m...@gmail.com> wrote: > My experiences with building mlvm based on bsd-port: > > On missing machine/endian.h if build on linux (FC10 in my case): > In jdk: replace with #include <endian.h> > > On error: class file for com.sun.jmx.snmp.Timestamp not found: > Build does not extract a few binary plug classes, fix jdk: > make/common/internal/BinaryPlugs.gmk > > To-be-encountered :): on NullPointerException for jar tool w...@listoffiles > param: > In jdk, src/share/classes/sun/tools/jar/Main.java: set new cwd property > before any of the extract() method is called (not only in one extract() > method) > > If using newly build openjdk-1.7.0 as ALT_BOOTDIR, javadoc vm crashes when > building certain docs. seemed to happen randomly, no fix, just workaround: > In jdk, make/common/shared/Defs-java.gmk: introduced new ALT_JAVADOC to use > jdk 6 javadoc > > Patch files attached > > fyi, Jürgen > > 2009/4/24 Chanwit Kaewkasi <chan...@gmail.com> >> >> More update, I am now stuck at this error, while compiling the bsd-port: >> >> error: class file for com.sun.jmx.snmp.Timestamp not found >> 1 error >> make[2]: *** [initial-image-jdk] Error 1 >> make[2]: Leaving directory `/opt/openjdk/bsd-port/jdk/make' >> make[1]: *** [jdk-build] Error 2 >> make[1]: Leaving directory `/opt/openjdk/bsd-port' >> >> The bootstrap jdk I'm using is Sun JDK 1.6.0_04-b12. Not sure if it's >> causing this error? >> >> Any suggestion would be great. >> >> Best regards, >> >> Chanwit >> >> On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 10:55 PM, Chanwit Kaewkasi <chan...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> > Updated: >> > I have managed to fix it per this: >> > http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/openbsd/2004-01/0356.html >> > by simply commenting the include statements out. >> > >> > Cheers, >> > >> > Chanwit >> > >> > On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 9:34 PM, Tobias Ivarsson <tho...@gmail.com> >> > wrote: >> >> >> >> Yes, that is the same error I got when using the same build process >> >> that >> >> worked for building the jdk7 branch for building the bsd-port branch. >> >> Do anyone know if the bsd-port needs some different kind of hand >> >> holding >> >> when building on linux, compared to the jdk7 branch? >> >> >> >> Cheers, >> >> Tobias >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> >> mlvm-dev mailing list >> >> mlvm-dev@openjdk.java.net >> >> http://mail.openjdk.java.net/mailman/listinfo/mlvm-dev >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> -- >> Chanwit Kaewkasi >> PhD Candidate, >> Centre for Novel Computing >> School of Computer Science >> The University of Manchester >> Oxford Road >> Manchester >> M13 9PL, UK >> _______________________________________________ >> mlvm-dev mailing list >> mlvm-dev@openjdk.java.net >> http://mail.openjdk.java.net/mailman/listinfo/mlvm-dev > > > _______________________________________________ > mlvm-dev mailing list > mlvm-dev@openjdk.java.net > http://mail.openjdk.java.net/mailman/listinfo/mlvm-dev > > _______________________________________________ mlvm-dev mailing list mlvm-dev@openjdk.java.net http://mail.openjdk.java.net/mailman/listinfo/mlvm-dev
