Frank Wierzbicki wrote: > On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 6:14 PM, John Rose <john.r...@sun.com> wrote: >> For language integration work, we should all be building from the MLVM >> patch repo, since it is a few steps in advance of the JDK7 repo. >> >> There is a small amount of new stuff beyond JDK7 (b59, M3) in there >> now, and I am collecting more stuff to push soon. > Great, I'm better oriented now -- though I'm having a little trouble > with the build (likely user error) -- The "make" directions in > mlvm/README.txt ended with an error, so I switched to the shell > command version at the bottom. I then issued a "make clean;make" in > davinci/sources. Does that sound like a reasonable approach? My > assumption (could be wrong) is that the patches get applied to sources > and so I can just do a typical make... please let me know if I'm on > the wrong path.
The short instructions error out for me too, so I did basically what you did and initiated the actual build myself. All is well. Also see the instructions in langtools/meth.txt to get the hax0red javac that can compile invokedynamic. It was very helpful for experimenting and getting your feet wet. - Charlie _______________________________________________ mlvm-dev mailing list mlvm-dev@openjdk.java.net http://mail.openjdk.java.net/mailman/listinfo/mlvm-dev