On Thu, 2009-05-21 at 04:59 -0700, John Rose wrote: > Yuck, a leftover from the invokeinterface encoding. It's even clearly > marked my code-distress marker (@@@@). > > Yes, your fix looks OK.... > > But, the @@@@ line wants to be something better, and I think there are > better entry points in constantPoolOop since I refactored the logic > there. Try to use cp->signature_ref_at() or at least > nt_signature_ref_at(). (You can remove the distress marker.)
Yes, using nt_signature_ref_at() looks like the right thing to do. I changed that. -- Christian _______________________________________________ mlvm-dev mailing list mlvm-dev@openjdk.java.net http://mail.openjdk.java.net/mailman/listinfo/mlvm-dev
