Le 10/12/2009 15:34, Charles Oliver Nutter a écrit : > On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 1:35 AM, Rémi Forax<[email protected]> wrote: > >> I've just tested the patch named "eager", and it doesn't work out of the >> box. >> You can't apply it without modify it (at least the hotspot patch, >> I haven't tested the langtools patch because I've my own backend) >> It was written against a revision that is too old to be handled >> by the mercurial patch mechanism. >> >> Moreover, the series file doesn't show the changeset used to write >> the patch, so you can't also go backward and apply the patch to >> the old revision because you don't know it :( >> > That may be true, but it was a working patch against *some* revision. > It should be possible to update it,
Yes, the question at 10 dollars is what is the revision (it's near b50, I think). > if people show enough interest in > getting it to work. > I prefer to see that in the dual way, If we show how to use it, it will be used. > - Charlie > Rémi _______________________________________________ mlvm-dev mailing list [email protected] http://mail.openjdk.java.net/mailman/listinfo/mlvm-dev
