And I'm almost exclusively interested in coro :)
On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 9:03 AM, Lukas Stadler <[email protected]> wrote: > Yes, the coro patch should be applied without continuations. > It doesn't need any of the continuation functionality - maybe I should > make that more clear in the series file... > - Lukas > > On 11.03.2010 12:58, Christian Thalinger wrote: >> On Wed, 2010-03-10 at 17:04 +0100, Lukas Stadler wrote: >> >>> Hi everybody! >>> >>> As you've probably seen I've pushed a new coroutine implementation into >>> the repository. >>> >> I'm just rebasing the mlvm patches to the latest code drop and HotSpot's >> coro.patch does not apply cleanly on top of the other patches (I think >> it's callcc.patch). Is that intentional? Should coro only be applied >> without callcc? >> >> -- Christian >> >> _______________________________________________ >> mlvm-dev mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://mail.openjdk.java.net/mailman/listinfo/mlvm-dev >> > > _______________________________________________ > mlvm-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://mail.openjdk.java.net/mailman/listinfo/mlvm-dev > _______________________________________________ mlvm-dev mailing list [email protected] http://mail.openjdk.java.net/mailman/listinfo/mlvm-dev
