On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 12:20 PM, Lukas Stadler <lukas.stad...@jku.at> wrote: > Wow, I didn't expect to instantly get that much feedback! > > I'm sorry, I should have updated the code examples to reflect the API > changes I did last week. > > I'm currently writing a paper about the coroutine implementation for > this year's PPPJ conference. That'll take up most of my time for the > next two weeks. > The line for coro.patch in the series file is really complicated, > basically what I'd like to say is "if you want to apply coro.patch then > you need to exclude all other patches". > I suppose there's a simpler way to do that?
That's quite acceptable. I don't think most of the separate MLVM projects can be co-applied yet anyway. We just want your coroutine stuff so badly we're willing to have a build without indy (the horror!) to get it :) > Assertion on OS X: I really need to get myself an OS X machine. It > currently runs fine on Ubuntu, I'll try to find out what's going wrong. I'm sure someone on this list would be happy to give you access to such a machine, if you can't get access yourself. Seems like at least half of us here are running OS X machines. > And I have to give out a warning to all the brave ones trying this out: > It's only a prototype, crashes from time to time and bites :-) You have to walk before you can run! Seriously though, this is very exciting stuff, and I think we're all interested in helping if we can. - Charlie _______________________________________________ mlvm-dev mailing list mlvm-dev@openjdk.java.net http://mail.openjdk.java.net/mailman/listinfo/mlvm-dev