On Nov 12, 2010, at 2:42 PM, Christian Thalinger wrote: > On Nov 12, 2010, at 2:35 PM, Rémi Forax wrote: >> Le 12/11/2010 12:26, Christian Thalinger a écrit : >>> As I have already said, I'm not expert here but these changes let all >>> tests of this testcase pass: >>> >>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~twisti/6998541/webrev.00/test/compiler/6998541/Test6998541.java.html >>> >>> I'm not sure if the assumption is correct that every non-zero >>> primitive value is a boolean true. >>> >>> John, Remi, I'd like your opinion on that. >>> >>> -- Christian >> >> Christian, >> methods unboxRaw call unbox versions, so you have also changed >> the semantics of all methods unboxRaw which seems a bad idea. > > > Yeah, I'm also a bit worried about that. I think I leave that up to > John to fix it properly.
John, is that actually a bug? -- Christian _______________________________________________ mlvm-dev mailing list [email protected] http://mail.openjdk.java.net/mailman/listinfo/mlvm-dev
