Thanks Kirill My plan is to use invokeExact so this matches my use case.
mark > > > > My question had to do with run time overhead. Do you think that > > invokeGeneric > > is slower than invokeEaxct at run time? If not then that removes one of the > > reasons for not using java classes. > > Hi Mark, > > The current invokeGeneric argument conversion implementation has poor > performance profile. In jdk7 b124 invokeGeneric() can be 50 times or > more slower than invokeExact() or invokeGeneric() with exactly matching > signature. > > As far as I know, John hopes to address this problem before JDK7 FCS. > > Best regards, > Kirill > _______________________________________________ > mlvm-dev mailing list > mlvm-dev@openjdk.java.net > http://mail.openjdk.java.net/mailman/listinfo/mlvm-dev
_______________________________________________ mlvm-dev mailing list mlvm-dev@openjdk.java.net http://mail.openjdk.java.net/mailman/listinfo/mlvm-dev
