On 02/06/2011 07:40 PM, Attila Szegedi wrote: > Hi folks, > > suppose I want to filter several disjunct ranges of arguments on a method > handle. I noticed that filterArguments() no longer tolerates null elements in > the filter array. This leaves me with two implementation strategies: > > 1. several chained filterArguments invocations, each specifying a continuous > range of filters, or > 2. replacing null elements in the filter array with appropriate > MethodHandle.identity() elements. > > Which one is the advised approach (meaning, it will end up performing better)? > > Thanks, > Attila.
Hi Attila, finally we decide to rollback that change, null are allowed in filterArguments(). one argument was that users will ask questions about performance of using identity() :) Rémi _______________________________________________ mlvm-dev mailing list mlvm-dev@openjdk.java.net http://mail.openjdk.java.net/mailman/listinfo/mlvm-dev
