On 02/11/2011 12:20 AM, Attila Szegedi wrote: > I was actually doing this until yesterday for compiling the dynalink > framework, and while the 1.6 javac did give me a warning and suggested I need > a newer version of the compiler, it didn't stop with an error. When those > classes were then loaded in an OpenJDK JVM, they nicely passed all tests. So > funnily enough, I was able to work on it with the 1.6 compiler :-) > > Of course, in my code, I never have actual invokedynamic call sites in the > bytecode, it's all about direct MethodHandle manipulation. > > Attila. >
You are not alone. I don't want to denounce someone but I know a ruby guy ( :) ) that also generate 1.6 classfile. Rémi _______________________________________________ mlvm-dev mailing list [email protected] http://mail.openjdk.java.net/mailman/listinfo/mlvm-dev
