Dear list, In a previous thread (that I cannot find again), I read that better performances could be achieved via the "invokedynamic" instruction rather than by using "MethodHandle" instances. However, it is not clear to me whether this is true only for the current state of the implementation, or should remain true in the future (read "at the time of JDK7 release").
If useful, here is a summary about the context: implementation of both an interpreter and a compiler supporting closures. Please not that for interoperability reasons, it will not be possible to use built-in currification-like support provided by handles. Hence, all calls will be "total". Thanks in advance for any insight. Kind regards, Xavier Clerc PS: I am quite eluctant to conduct micro-benchmark, especially because JDK implementation is moving faster than my tests... _______________________________________________ mlvm-dev mailing list mlvm-dev@openjdk.java.net http://mail.openjdk.java.net/mailman/listinfo/mlvm-dev
