On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 4:00 AM, Christian Thalinger <christian.thalin...@oracle.com> wrote: >> I'm still a little skeptical about that. What benchmarks did you run?
Skeptical? Do you think it should be faster or slower? I was comparing recursive fib (bench_fib_recursive.rb) with normal JRuby versus JRuby + indy. Normal was around 0.16-0.17s for fib(30) and indy was around 0.11-0.12s. > Btw. when I try indy JRuby I get: > > $ bin/jruby.sh -J-Djruby.compile.invokedynamic=true > -J-XX:+UnlockExperimentalVMOptions -J-XX:+EnableMethodHandles > -J-XX:+EnableInvokeDynamic test/test_array.rb > VM option '+UnlockExperimentalVMOptions' > VM option '+EnableMethodHandles' > VM option '+EnableInvokeDynamic' > LoadError: load error: builtin/java/org.jruby.ast -- > java.lang.RuntimeException: java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: bad reorder > array Ahh, I must still have one or more of my permutes botched. I'll try to fix this up today. Thanks! - Charlie _______________________________________________ mlvm-dev mailing list mlvm-dev@openjdk.java.net http://mail.openjdk.java.net/mailman/listinfo/mlvm-dev
